We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Are IFA fees reasonable?
Options
Comments
-
Prism said:Why has a post about IFA fees turning into one about active vs passive funds? .
0 -
@Alan_P_2, it helps the OP greatly to see that an IFA struggles to provide added value compared to a simple multi asset solution.
Nothing generic about the questions posed. The IFA was challenged and floundered to offer a coherent response, bar selectively quoting earlier replies out of context.
https://monevator.com/financial-advisors-swindlers-and-leeches/
0 -
But you haven't shown that an IFA struggles to provide added value compared to a simple multi-asset solution, all you have done, and all you can do is offer your opinion.
The IFA has stated that they use simple multi-asset solutions when suitable, so is theirs not as good as the ones you are favouring?
The only other person to use an IFA that has responded on here was positive about the experience.
My in-laws are in their 80s and have used an IFA for nearly 30 years. I have no idea what they pay or what they are invested in or what their returns are, but I do know that it is almost certainly a better option than the stick to cash approach which is where they were before and still would have been.
For some people using an IFA is absolutely the correct thing to do.
Out of interest how many of the contributors to this thread have actual, personal experience of using an IFA to base their views on?
I haven't used one, apart from for DB pension transfer required advice, so have no personal evidence on whether they add value or not.
6 -
An IFA does and will continue to provide added value compared to an off the shelf multi asset product. Why? Because their involvement creates a tailwind. An extra hurdle to overcome. This isn't my personal opinion, it's in plain sight and a common sense deduction.
Yes, an IFA using a simple multi-asset solution when suitable is perfectly reasonable. But wait, the IFA takes their slice of the investment pie. This WILL impact the net return.
Maybe they use a MA solution when the 'research' software hits a glitch, but they've gotta do something, haven't they?0 -
dunstonh said:If that works for you then great. However, what if the IFA portfolios have a consistent track record of beating the equivalent VLS?
There are plenty of DIY investors doing exactly the same {putting together their own VLS-type mix} as well. And beating VLS in the process.In which case one might go with a IFA portfolio, but do they have a consistent record of beating an equivalent (risk level) portfolio after costs? And if it's not all such IFA portfolios with that track record, how was one to know which ones would achieve that, 20 years ago when we started out investing? And for those portfolios which have, how do we know they (or which of them?) will continue to outperform after costs for the next 20 years? It seems impossible to know if one is choosing a 'winner' compared to a VLS, or a 'loser' however satisfactory a 'loser' might turn out to be. That is 'the problem'.Likely some people would be happy to have had a 'loser' if all the losers turned out to be good enough for their needs anyway, and not worry that they'd missed better, easily achievable VLS returns and not had a good 'win' that might also have resulted from avoiding VLS.I guess the second para is saying: 'if plenty of DIY investors can beat VLS, then so can paid advisors'. Not sure it gets us past 'the problem' however.
0 -
lescarp88 said:@dunstonh, would you agree that a low cost Vanguard world tracker does represent the wisdom of the crowd. The investor gets the colllective wisdom of the market for a very low fee. Very tough to beat mathematically.1
-
Thrugelmir said:If "Lars Kroijer suggests " and everyone follows his advice. Where's the wisdom. Little more than a herd of sheep following each other. Which simply pushes money into the same pool of stocks and drives prices upwards. I
0 -
@Thrugelmir, Lars Kroijer is a highly respected former hedge fund manager. It's fair to assume his suggestions may be informed by useful experience, if not the definitive answer.
If we're just talking about the equities part of a portfolio, wisdom of the crowd refers to the colllective intelligence of every market participant. Active traders, hedge funds, pension funds, institutional investors, etc. Very difficult to beat without an edge.
That's the argument for choosing a low cost "passive" investment portfolio.
Your assertion that the retail investor "is the market" is not wholly true. They are one piece of the pie providing the colllective "wisdom" which informs the current market price.
Your post sounded confident that prices have been pushed up. That might suggest you've found an elusive 'edge' and can short the market or will not be investing in equities for now. Although I suspect neither is true.0 -
Well, it seems like there might be an issue, and we're not the only ones agonising over it.'Some passive strategies amplify market volatility, and the shift has increased industry concentration, but it has diminished some liquidity and redemption risks. Finally, evidence is mixed on the links between indexing and comovement of asset returns and liquidity.'
Anadu, Kenechukwu, Mathias Kruttli, Patrick McCabe, and Emilio Osambela (2020). “The Shift from Active to Passive Investing: Potential Risks to Financial Stability?,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2018-060r1. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2018.060r1.
0 -
lescarp88 said:@Thrugelmir, Lars Kroijer is a highly respected former hedge fund manager. It's fair to assume his suggestions may be informed by useful experience, if not the definitive answer.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards