We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Selling and rebuying inside a stocks and shares ISA?

CreditCardChris
Posts: 344 Forumite

Let's say I sold £50,000 worth of stock but kept the money in the ISA, then a few months later I decided to rebuy £50,000 worth of shares, am I locked at the £20,000 limit? So I would have to buy £20k worth in 2021, £20k worth in 2022 and then £10k worth in 2023?
Or once the money is in the ISA, that's it you can buy and sell and trade etc as long as you don't withdraw the funds?
Or once the money is in the ISA, that's it you can buy and sell and trade etc as long as you don't withdraw the funds?
0
Comments
-
CreditCardChris said:Let's say I sold £50,000 worth of stock but kept the money in the ISA, then a few months later I decided to rebuy £50,000 worth of shares, am I locked at the £20,000 limit? So I would have to buy £20k worth in 2021, £20k worth in 2022 and then £10k worth in 2023?
NO
Or once the money is in the ISA, that's it you can buy and sell and trade etc as long as you don't withdraw the funds?
Yes0 -
CreditCardChris said:Or once the money is in the ISA, that's it you can buy and sell and trade etc as long as you don't withdraw the funds?Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0
-
jimjames said:...Some ISAs have over £1 million of investments in them and everything is tax free which is great for the holder, not so great for the Treasury for collecting tax.
How does that sit with the £85k banking rules?It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end....0 -
Langtang said:How does that sit with the £85k banking rules?FSCS protect up to £85k in a bank or regulated investment account (although the investment assets you purchase are ultimately unprotected) however the assets are safer in an investment account as, unlike a bank, the investment platform is required to segregate client assets from their own money. Still there is always the risk of fraud or error which if beyond the platform's ability to compensate you could result in a loss.I would hope that those that have built up £1m+ in S&S ISAs are using at least a couple of unrelated platforms and fund managers to spread their risk and increase the proportion that is FSCS protected.
0 -
Langtang said:jimjames said:...Some ISAs have over £1 million of investments in them and everything is tax free which is great for the holder, not so great for the Treasury for collecting tax.
How does that sit with the £85k banking rules?
Banks go bust ( or have to be rescued) usually because they lend too much money to risky borrowers, who can't pay them back . It is a totally different scenario.3 -
Albermarle said:Langtang said:
Stupid question alert!How does that sit with the £85k banking rules?
It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end....0 -
Langtang said:Albermarle said:Langtang said:
Stupid question alert!How does that sit with the £85k banking rules?The 85k figure is what is protected by the FSCS in the event the institution goes busy and cannot pay you back your money.
Edit: Bust!!!0 -
grumiofoundation said:
The 85k figure is what is protected by the FSCS in the event the institution goes busy and cannot pay you back your money.2 -
grumiofoundation said:Langtang said:Albermarle said:Langtang said:
Stupid question alert!How does that sit with the £85k banking rules?The 85k figure is what is protected by the FSCS in the event the institution goes busy and cannot pay you back your money.
So, if I have 85k in an ISA and 85k in a S&S ISA with the same bank, are they both protected? I assume that the shares are not lost if bank goes bust. Am I correct?It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end....0 -
Langtang said:So, if I have 85k in an ISA and 85k in a S&S ISA with the same bank, are they both protected? I assume that the shares are not lost if bank goes bust. Am I correct?The accounts are only protected up to a combined £85k but provided there has been no fraud or error on the investment account the shares should be in a segregated client nominee account and the FSCS would only need to cover the lost cash in the bank account. Of course if the investment account held shares in the bank that just went bust that would be lost too!
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards