We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
VAT
Options
Comments
-
Sandtree said:Sandtree said:Artnico said:I bought something from Germany through an English website worth £350. When it was delivered the courier company charged me 20% VAT plus an extra charge. Is this correct? Thanks
If they are doing things correctly they should have sold it net of the German equivalent of VAT (which is currently 16% or 19% depending on when the sale was) as it was being exported but small merchants etc are often not great at realising these things.
I may be incorrect but I don't think there is any obligation to knock the VAT off when exporting, at least here in the UK.
There is no obligation to not charge VAT on goods sold for export as long as you pass the tax you say your charging to the vat man. The law says when you have to, if you want to generate additional tax for HMRC or equivalents they will never say no. Clearly issues occur when you state you are charging VAT but aren't then passing the monies to HMRC.
If the goods are zero rated then the VAT man gets zero, although the tax man gets more as the profit is higher.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
the_lunatic_is_in_my_head said:
I understand there's no need for a boarding pass for onlines sales, it was just relevant to the airport comparison, what the retailer would need is proof of permanent export.
If the goods are zero rated then the VAT man gets zero, although the tax man gets more as the profit is higher.
The Tax Man only gets more if the seller increases the price to the gross price. As noted by NearlyOld most will simply not add sales tax to the net price and therefore their profit remains identical as they still get the £100 they would have even if they had charged £100 + VAT for a non-export sale. (Lets ignore the complexity of those on flat rated scheme)0 -
Sandtree said:the_lunatic_is_in_my_head said:
I understand there's no need for a boarding pass for onlines sales, it was just relevant to the airport comparison, what the retailer would need is proof of permanent export.
If the goods are zero rated then the VAT man gets zero, although the tax man gets more as the profit is higher.
The Tax Man only gets more if the seller increases the price to the gross price. As noted by NearlyOld most will simply not add sales tax to the net price and therefore their profit remains identical as they still get the £100 they would have even if they had charged £100 + VAT for a non-export sale. (Lets ignore the complexity of those on flat rated scheme)
Use of the word correctly in the previous post I quoted would suggest the retailer is acting incorrectly if they didn't reduce the price when exporting outside their VAT area.In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
the_lunatic_is_in_my_head said:
Use of the word correctly in the previous post I quoted would suggest the retailer is acting incorrectly if they didn't reduce the price when exporting outside their VAT area.
When goods are exported they are ‘consumed’ outside the UK and to impose VAT on such goods would be contrary to the purpose of the tax. Therefore, the supply of exported goods is zero-rated provided the conditions in this notice are met.
So even though it'd be more money in HMRC's coffers they even discourage the application of 20% VAT on export goods even if it'd be legal to do so (if the monies are then passed to HMRC)
Saying an item sold in Germany for EU delivery is £100 + 19% (£119) or for outside EU delivery is £119 + 0% is legal but is by far the minority of vendors approaches.1 -
Sandtree said:the_lunatic_is_in_my_head said:
Use of the word correctly in the previous post I quoted would suggest the retailer is acting incorrectly if they didn't reduce the price when exporting outside their VAT area.
Saying an item sold in Germany for EU delivery is £100 + 19% (£119) or for outside EU delivery is £119 + 0% is legalIn the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
It's pretty simple really. goods over £135 then the courier bills you for the VAT. Goods under £135 then the vendor charges you the VAT at the time of sale then they pay it to the UK VAT man.
EU sellers must now register for UK VAT if they want to sell to the UK.0 -
bris said:It's pretty simple really. goods over £135 then the courier bills you for the VAT. Goods under £135 then the vendor charges you the VAT at the time of sale then they pay it to the UK VAT man.
EU sellers must now register for UK VAT if they want to sell to the UK.0 -
Sandtree said:bris said:It's pretty simple really. goods over £135 then the courier bills you for the VAT. Goods under £135 then the vendor charges you the VAT at the time of sale then they pay it to the UK VAT man.
EU sellers must now register for UK VAT if they want to sell to the UK.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0 -
the_lunatic_is_in_my_head said:
The loss in revenue is probably too small to worry about covering the eventuality as the cost of collecting will outweigh the tax.0 -
Sandtree said:the_lunatic_is_in_my_head said:
The loss in revenue is probably too small to worry about covering the eventuality as the cost of collecting will outweigh the tax.
Marketplaces are collecting the VAT, including those outside the UK like Aliexpress, what's left is mainly independent websites and I'd imagine the gaps will slowly be closed. Perhaps service providers such as Shopify will have to ensure their users comply.
These taxes apply to places like Norway, Australia and US states so it's not just the UK requiring this (although what the requirements are in other places I don't know).
If you look around there are plenty of websites selling stuff they shouldn't (like knock off goods, even big ones like Wish have some very questionable listings for branded stuff at very low prices), 100% compliance would require 100% authority, as with most things likelihood is it will be balanced so the majority comply.
In the game of chess you can never let your adversary see your pieces0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards