Court report: Excel vs Mr C: Excel lose another SD gym claim at Skipton (woeful evidence bundle)

Redx

If you wait long enough , the Trump arguments will come up !!  😋😁😜

Uptown_Boy

Redx said:

If you wait long enough , the Trump arguments will come up !!  😋😁😜

Is that a derivation of Godwin's Law?  

Redx

Uptown_Boy said:

Redx said:

If you wait long enough , the Trump arguments will come up !!  😋😁😜

Is that a derivation of Godwin's Law?  

It certainly is 😄
It's like mentioning that you have met the Queen and been complemented , dissing the plebs at the same time by inferring there is a hierarchy 🤔

Snakes_Belly

To me its like a form of indoctrination. A belief that what they are doing is good and right and they hold on to that belief even when the majority has other opinions. There is of course as well, the money element. As Redx says there are more honourable ways to earn a living.  

Snakes_Belly

@Redx QBV11 is based on the case below. Dering was mentioned in the book "Exodus" by Uris and bought a claim of libel against Uris. The trial took place in court QBV11. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dering_v_Uris
 

Umkomaas

Snakes_Belly said:

To me its like a form of indoctrination. A belief that what they are doing is good and right and they hold on to that belief even when the majority has other opinions. There is of course as well, the money element. As Redx says there are more honourable ways to earn a living.  

They are following the BS doctrine of the IPC - enshrined in their Code of Practice.  Careful how you read it or you too might start to believe the doctrine BS!

Those who do conform often enjoy free and forgettable parking events that are heavily outshone by the more interesting parts of their daily activities, especially when they abide by the terms and conditions on parking signage.

Most right-thinking people would accept that parking and parking enforcement is a necessity. Some, however, do not. Instead they choose to boycott the regime often finding increasingly inventive ways to challenge the system. Some vocal minorities appear to want to make it their life’s work to find some other parking utopia. But for the most part, the status quo works and can strike that crucial balance between protecting valuable assets and allowing motoring freedom.

It is important to remember that companies managing parking on private land provide a significant contribution to the economy both directly and indirectly. Not only do the provision of car parks help local high streets at a time when many retailers are struggling but there are also many people directly or indirectly employed within the private parking industry. From parking attendants and appeals processing staff to dedicated IT specialists, the parking industry directly employs a wide range of personnel with equally diverse skill sets, creating jobs and feeding directly into the UK economy. Not so obvious, but probably just as significant are the economic ripples that flow out of the industry by the outsourcing of some specialised skills like printing or website development. It is unthinkable to imagine the chaos which would ensue if the private parking industry were to change in a way which left landowners unable to provide parking facilities or protect other pieces of private land.

Snakes_Belly

"Not only do the provision of car parks help local high streets at a time when many retailers are struggling"

What! How does that work then?

Snakes_Belly

"Not so obvious, but probably just as significant are the economic ripples that flow out of the industry by the outsourcing of some specialised skills like printing."

Like the printing of the eighty page WS of irrelevant twaddle. A tree has probably died for that.

Redx

Snakes_Belly said:

"Not so obvious, but probably just as significant are the economic ripples that flow out of the industry by the outsourcing of some specialised skills like printing."

Like the printing of the eighty page WS of irrelevant twaddle. A tree has probably died for that.

That is my point , stick to relevant facts only instead of smoke , mirrors and half truths buried in oodles of twaddle in case one part sticks. Plus don't send in very late witness statements trying to ambush a defendant who may have no representation by witnesses who weren't present

Be different if JB was up against Bowen QC or Davey for example , parking eye ducked the first one !!

My relative was up against Excel when they were in the BPA , the claimant woefully failed to follow their landowner contract to allow one hour free parking on the site before charging , the case being about 45 minutes on site , the claimant lost at Popla , they have also now lost the parking contract to ECP for that retail park

Another one they lost at Popla was the infamous Peel centre , now monitored by Anchor Care Parking , another contract loss !!

What goes around comes around , they lost those two alone on contracts and signage , taught me a lot , ably assisted by Mr prankster regarding evidence packs !!

D_P_Dance

The comparison between these companies and the deluded occupant of the White House are surely obvious.