Not sure I have any way out of this fine at CC stage

Redx

If they win there will be a CCJ for you , deferred for one month to enable you to pay it off in full to avoid it being registered and affecting your credit rating for 6 years

So if you lose in Court , you pay up , promptly , asap preferably

You could start a new thread if this new claim is nothing to do with this thread topic

One topic , one thread

Read the newbies FAQ sticky thread near the top of the forum , your CCJ questions are answered in there , same as everything else

pinkbottletop

Ticket no 1: NCP, BW Legal, Defence submitted
Ticket no 2: NCP, BW Legal, 15th December notice date.

Redx

So follow the process for claim 2 that you followed for claim 1

Also state that you want both claims consolidated into one claim hearing , providing that it's the same NCP , same location etc

They should have issued one claim for all outstanding PCN,s , not two or more

pinkbottletop

Redx said:

So follow the process for claim 2 that you followed for claim 1

Also state that you want both claims consolidated into one claim hearing , providing that it's the same NCP , same location etc

They should have issued one claim for all outstanding PCN,s , not two or more

Thank you. Where do I state this? In my AoS?

Redx

No , nothing is put in the AOS other than following the instructions in the newbies FAQ sticky thread

It's an addition to your defence submission and every stage after that , including to your local court for the claims to be consolidated into one hearing with one set of charges etc

nosferatu1001

Well no. No room on mcol for that

do it on EVERY communication to the ccbc 
give the claim ref for both and state as this relates to same car park both should be consolidated. Saves burden on the courts and the unrep defendant 

Umkomaas

Chanelley said:

Ticket no 1: NCP, BW Legal, Defence submitted
Ticket no 2: NCP, BW Legal, 15th December notice date.

But I got the impression that you were dealing with two different parking firms?

Chanelley said:

Hi all. So I've since had another county court claim (for other parking in the same car park before I realised that there are two companies manning the same car park). 

pinkbottletop

Yes, I hadn't realised NCP and SABA both had different sections of the same car park, so I paid SABA and parked in NCP space (two different parking firms but both with NCP).

Umkomaas

Chanelley said:

Yes, I hadn't realised NCP and SABA both had different sections of the same car park, so I paid SABA and parked in NCP space (two different parking firms but both with NCP).

Thanks, that's clearer. You need to take every opportunity to expose the fact that there are two separate claims for the same car park with broadly similar circumstances and that you require consolidation. BWL are unlikely to be aware (or playing any 'game'); all cases are computer generated, there's unlikely be human intervention until a bit later in the process, even then, unless you're pushing the fact, they won't be in any rush to take the lead on consolidation.  The more they make you stew, the more likely they will believe that you will capitulate. 

pinkbottletop

That makes perfect sense. Thank you!