We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
DWP checking Claimants bank account details
Options
Comments
-
Jack_bauer24 said:Thanks for all your replies. I am currently on Universal Credit but I have signed off sick till December as I got my sick note extended yesterday as my mental health isn't good. What I want to know, I have Sky digital but once this comes into force where DWP check bank accounts and they see I am paying Sky, will they reduce my payments? or has it got nothing to do with them what I spend my money on? Sky is the only thing keeping me entertain at the moment as I record my soaps.What spend your money on is up to you.I would try and stop worrying about it !Read books, watch Sky, surf the net, take up a hobby .......Advice given on Assured and Regulated Tenancy, Further advice should always be sought from a Solicitor....1
-
TELLIT01 said:Jack_bauer24 said:Does anyone know if it's true regarding the latest news that DWP are going to allow to check Universal Credit claimants bank account? is that not personal? not that I have anything to hide, I just think it's private that's all.Yes, DWP already have the power to investigate where they think a fraud has happened. For example, if a person claims means-tested benefits and they have capital of over £16,000 which they do not declare, and DWP suspect, they have powers to request bank account details to aid the investigation.What DWP are seeking here is much wider powers to prevent fraud from happening in the first place, rather than trying to investigate and prosecute after the event. What DWP are seeking is wider data sharing with financial institutions at the point of making the claim, so where a claimant declares capital of less than £16,000, DWP would have access to a data feed from the banks that could confirm a person's assets in much the same way DWP have access to earnings data from HMRC. This could be a fully automated system whereby the banks just respond with a yes/no answer to the question do their assets match what they have told us, allowing suspicious claims to be immediately flagged for investigation. DWP need not actually have access to any hard data at this point, just an indication that something is not right. Such a system could also be used to verify capital at the end of each AP to determine if existing claimants had exceeded capital limits, or if capital amounts had dropped resulting in a potentially higher award.1
-
Oh well, back to the tried and tested "cash under the mattress" method then.
1 -
JonVarnas said:Oh well, back to the tried and tested "cash under the mattress" method then.7
-
JonVarnas said:Oh well, back to the tried and tested "cash under the mattress" method then.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54710897
- All land is owned. If you are not on yours, you are on someone else's
- When on someone else's be it a road, a pavement, a right of way or a property there are rules. Don't assume there are none.
- "Free parking" doesn't mean free of rules. Check the rules and if you don't like them, go elsewhere
- All land is owned. If you are not on yours, you are on someone else's and their rules apply.
0 -
Galloglass said:JonVarnas said:Oh well, back to the tried and tested "cash under the mattress" method then.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-547108971 -
GHolmesAdmin said:Having worked for various of these departments the only time an investigation was launched was after someone was reported by a 'friend' neighbour etc, the vast majority of these reports are malicious but once made there's a legal obligation to investigate, even the person who made the report cannot stop it if they change their minds and many tried when they regretted their heat of the moment actions. What they can do and what they have the personpower to do are two different things. There is next to no random checking especially now. However there is sheer bad luck sometimes - I do remember one poor sod who was caught out when his lorry crashed into the car of a housing benefits employee, she looked him up on the system and found the address he had given her had a woman claiming as a single occupant living there...1
-
Silvertabby said:GHolmesAdmin said:Having worked for various of these departments the only time an investigation was launched was after someone was reported by a 'friend' neighbour etc, the vast majority of these reports are malicious but once made there's a legal obligation to investigate, even the person who made the report cannot stop it if they change their minds and many tried when they regretted their heat of the moment actions. What they can do and what they have the personpower to do are two different things. There is next to no random checking especially now. However there is sheer bad luck sometimes - I do remember one poor sod who was caught out when his lorry crashed into the car of a housing benefits employee, she looked him up on the system and found the address he had given her had a woman claiming as a single occupant living there...2
-
Galloglass said:JonVarnas said:Oh well, back to the tried and tested "cash under the mattress" method then.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54710897That's no biggie - just pay cash into a Monzo and use the contactless if needs be.I can't see this getting idea from the DWP getting off the ground anytime soon. For a start the cost of implementing a computer system like this would be enormous and would dwarf the amount of actual fraud in the benefits system. Also, if you were so inclined, would be pretty simple to circumvent.It's just the head bods at the DWP being lazy.1 -
JonVarnas said:Galloglass said:JonVarnas said:Oh well, back to the tried and tested "cash under the mattress" method then.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54710897That's no biggie - just pay cash into a Monzo and use the contactless if needs be.I can't see this getting idea from the DWP getting off the ground anytime soon. For a start the cost of implementing a computer system like this would be enormous and would dwarf the amount of actual fraud in the benefits system. Also, if you were so inclined, would be pretty simple to circumvent.It's just the head bods at the DWP being lazy.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards