Claim form received. Help needed

Coupon-mad

It is also admitted that the Defendant was not the driver of the vehicle in question at the time of the alleged incident.

What?  Eh?  If you were not the driver you use the word 'DENIED' and remove 'NOT'.

aso2007

Coupon-mad said:

It is also admitted that the Defendant was not the driver of the vehicle in question at the time of the alleged incident.

What?  Eh?  If you were not the driver you use the word 'DENIED' and remove 'NOT'.

Thank you Coupon-mad. I have changed it to:
It is admitted that the Defendant was the registered keeper of the vehicle in question but liability is denied. It is also denied that the Defendant was the driver of the vehicle in question at the time of the alleged incident.

Coupon-mad

That's better (if that's true, of course). 

A defence must 'admit or deny' all allegations or put the C to strict proof of allegations unable to be admitted or denied.

aso2007

Coupon-mad said:

That's better (if that's true, of course). 

A defence must 'admit or deny' all allegations or put the C to strict proof of allegations unable to be admitted or denied.

Of course, that is a true statement. I am a teacher and I will provide proof that I was in school at the time of the incident.
Shall I submit the defence letter? 

1505grandad

A heads up  -  heading title:-
"Excel Parking services limited " - capital letters "Services Limited"

Coupon-mad

Shall I submit the defence letter? 

Yes but not as a 'letter' but by email to the CCBC, as advised already (once signed and dated). 
I would change this which doesn't read well:

Upon receiving all data, it was clear to the defendant that the claimant claimed that an NTK   The Claimant suggests that a Notice to Keeper was sent on 30/03/2020 and a reminder was sent on 28/04/2020; however, the Defendant denies that such letters were received and would not have ignored them, as is shown by the Defendant's level of engagement since.

aso2007

1505grandad said:

A heads up  -  heading title:-
"Excel Parking services limited " - capital letters "Services Limited"

Spelling corrected as suggested. Thank you 1505grandad.

Coupon-mad said:

Shall I submit the defence letter? 

Yes but not as a 'letter' but by email to the CCBC, as advised already (once signed and dated). 
I would change this which doesn't read well:

Upon receiving all data, it was clear to the defendant that the claimant claimed that an NTK   The Claimant suggests that a Notice to Keeper was sent on 30/03/2020 and a reminder was sent on 28/04/2020; however, the Defendant denies that such letters were received and would not have ignored them, as is shown by the Defendant's level of engagement since.

I have changed it. 
I can't thank you enough Coupon-mad.

aso2007

Hi everyone,
I have just filled in the DQ (N180 form) and I just want to confirm if the two copies (one to court and one to the claimant) have to be posted or we can email them.

Thank you

Redx

These days email should be fine , due to covid19 , which has finally brought things up to date

Use the ccbcaq address for the CCBC one , email a copy to the claimant , check the mcol website in a few days to see if it's been recorded, checking your inbox and spam folder for auto responses

aso2007

Redx said:

These days email should be fine , due to covid19 , which has finally brought things up to date

Use the ccbcaq address for the CCBC one , email a copy to the claimant , check the mcol website in a few days to see if it's been recorded, checking your inbox and spam folder for auto responses

Thank you Redx.
Email sent to both claimant and CCBC. Auto response from CCBC received.