We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
30k out of pocket
Comments
-
..... the number of times I was told that I was wrong, that I didn't know my job, and that 'it' was all over the newspapershugheskevi said:
It was a nightmare managing DC schemes which did not offer the freedoms - very few members could understand that the rules were permissive, not mandatory, and that generated so many ill-informed demands.Silvertabby said:When the 'pension freedoms' were first announced, even though they only applied to DC schemes, the DB LGPS was swamped with calls from both current and deferred members wanting their pensions under 'the new rules'.
Many of the callers seemed to be working on the assumption that 'their' money would just be transferred to their bank accounts.5
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
