NEWBIES L B C AND DEBT CLAIM

Coupon-mad

Surely if Southampton have done it, shouldn't all courts do the same to keep in line and consistent with each other.

No, because BW Legal appealed one.

Darren104

Coupon-mad said:

No, because BW Legal appealed one.

Yes but wasn't  the appeal lost 

Coupon-mad

No.  You have missed the Semark-Jullien case from this Summer.

The hearing I assisted in was Britannia v Crosby but Mr Semark-Jullien sat there hanging on our coat-tails.  The hearing I won was NOT an appeal. Then they appealed the Semark-Jullien decision, knowing he wouldn't put up a fight.

Le_Kirk

Darren104 said:

Coupon-mad said:

No.  You have missed the Semark-Jullien case from this Summer.
The hearing I assisted in was Britannia v Crosby but Mr Semark-Jullien sat there hanging on our coat-tails.  The hearing I won was NOT an appeal. Then they appealed the Semark-Jullien decision, knowing he wouldn't put up a fight.

Oh ok, maybe i will have a read of that one later.

It's in the standard defence template paragraph 7.

Darren104

I will upload a few pics of a couple of the signs to check with you if they are fair. Should the signs actuality display the terms and conditions,  coz it says on the sign that you have to request a copy of the terms and conditions.  

twhitehousescat

that you have to request a copy of the terms and conditions. 

classic , bloody classic 

Darren104

twhitehousescat said:

that you have to request a copy of the terms and conditions. 

classic , bloody classic 

Can you elaborate a bit more on what you mean. Thanks

KeithP

Quite simply...

How on earth can you possibly decide whether to park or not based on Terms and Conditions that are on the internet somewhere?

Having found the T&Cs and read them, you will have almost certainly spent more time than is allowed before paying - but you won't know that until you have read the T&Cs.

Does everyone have to have a smart phone these days - or indeed any phone?

Laughable.

D_P_Dance

Read this

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284426/oft311.pdf

Darren104

KeithP said:

Quite simply...

How on earth can you possibly decide whether to park or not based on Terms and Conditions that are on the internet somewhere?

Having found the T&Cs and read them, you will have almost certainly spent more time than is allowed before paying - but you won't know that until you have read the T&Cs.

Does everyone have to have a smart phone these days - or indeed any phone?

Laughable.

 I have just read this on the BPA Guide to Members Parking Management on private land

12.3.1 Wording that may be used on mandatory entrance signs

The information below enables you to construct a sign that outlines the enforcement regime that the motorist can expect when they enter the car park that you own/manage. When you specify the sign, you must be aware that it is a summary of the main Terms and Conditions that will be found on your signs in the car park. Therefore you should not add too many conditions to this sign; otherwise you defeat the object of placing a summary sign at the entrance to your site.

Looks like the pictures of the signage i have attached is legitimate, unless anyone can tell me any different. 

The reason for the  Decline of my appeal was as follows...

Dear Mr xxxxxx, Re: Parking Charge Notice Number ZPxxxxxxx (Vehicle: xxxxxx) Site: Wolverhampton Church Street Issue date: 23/04/2018 Thank you for your appeal received on 23/05/2018 regarding the above detailed Parking Charge Notice, we have reviewed your case and considered the comments you have made. Your appeal has also been considered in conjunction with the evidence gathered by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras, which record your entry and exit times. Our records show the notice was correctly issued as your vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms and Conditions of Parking.