Driver left site ticket.

Coupon-mad

Now to make a real difference and support our campaign for change, please can the OP do this:

Get ANGRY and GET EVEN about this scam!   Please now make a real difference:

A TASK FOR SEPTEMBER:

The Government is (this month only) consulting about a new statutory code of practice (CoP) and framework to rein in the rogue parking firms.  Read and comment on the draft CoP proposal and the enforcement framework consultation, and get everyone you know to do the same.

You will need to register to comment on the CoP and enter an occupation even if you are retired or a homemaker, but otherwise it is easy to navigate, and comment upon each section/subsection individually. You can save comments to edit later and or submit comments once you are happy with them.

https://standardsdevelopment.bsigroup.com/projects/2020-00193#/section

You do not need to register to comment on the enforcement framework which can be found here. It has a link on page 5 to make comments.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/913272/Code_Enforcement_Framework_consultation.pdf

At the very least, we say the parking charge level should be £50/£25 or higher level £70/£35, as per Council PCNs in E&W.  

And we say the added fake 'debt recovery' costs are just double counting the cost of letters and MUST GO.  Remove that layer and you remove the ‘drivers’ behind the race to court.

HOW TO DO THE SUBMISSIONS:

Responses into the PAS 232 and MHCLG framework documents are not completely straightforward:

On the MHCLG response, you have to answer the questions on a 1-5 scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree, and then put some commentary. No way to upload documents or alternatives.

 

On the PAS 232, you have to click on each clause and sub-clause to put your comments, and a suggested rewording of their draft.  You can see comments which other people have written! 

 

But, when you click ‘submit’, a message pops up to say your comments have been received, but that only applies to the particular clause you have just addressed.

 

You have to click ‘submit’ separately for each individual clause response.

 

Some people will be caught out by this but can revisit it and add further responses up to 12 October.

 

 

Le_Kirk

BrownTrout said:

YorkshireHardware said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes, like I said, prove you were a patron and deny leaving the site.  Tick 'driver' in your case to PREVENT any NTK being sent.

Have done so. Got an email confirmation back from ukpc saying its on hold while under appeal. Used brown trouts message practically verbatim. Hopefully hear back soon.
Thanks to all. 

ill eat my hat if they dont cancel .....

I hope it's a Pork Pie (hat)!

Fruitcake

BrownTrout said:

YorkshireHardware said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes, like I said, prove you were a patron and deny leaving the site.  Tick 'driver' in your case to PREVENT any NTK being sent.

Have done so. Got an email confirmation back from ukpc saying its on hold while under appeal. Used brown trouts message practically verbatim. Hopefully hear back soon.

Thanks to all. 

ill eat my hat if they dont cancel .....

What, even if it is a £300 Panama hat? 

D_P_Dance

Why not, it is only a cheap one.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Borsalino-Panama-Fedora-Montecristi-Fine-for-Cinta-Cannete-Straw-Hat-Summer-Fei/372610097241?hash=item56c14ae059:g:tMYAAOSwobJccTL0

KeithP

YorkshireHardware said:

Coupon-mad said:

Yes, like I said, prove you were a patron and deny leaving the site.  Tick 'driver' in your case to PREVENT any NTK being sent.

Have done so. Got an email confirmation back from ukpc saying its on hold while under appeal. Used brown trouts message practically verbatim. Hopefully hear back soon.

Thanks to all. 

@YorkshireHardware, is it time yet for you to come back and tell us the outcome?