We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Recently found shares. Who should claim them?

14567810»

Comments

  • Shelldean
    Shelldean Posts: 2,422 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    xylophone said:
    I can identify seven, born 1932 to 1950.
    So eldest could be 88 and youngest is 70.
    You said that the surname is common but if any of the siblings were girls, you might (just for interest) check for marriages - one of them might have ended up as a Mrs Expialidocious and be easy to trace .............

    Three of the siblings are female.
    Searched put of curiosity and can't positively identify any of them. One of the girls I found two possible marriages in neighbouring registration districts. 
    But nothing for the other two.
    I only found the children of the shareholder, so easy because I knew his first wife's name. So was able to find their marriage and therefore her maiden name. Easy after that!

    But to be honest if Equinti go down the blood relative route. It's not my problem!! Am sure they and/or their search company have much more resources than me!
    I'm not doing their work for them!
  • Yeah.  Think I'd be inclined to draw a line under it too.

    Unless you or your husband wants to track them down and charge a finder's fee!  The two of you must be able to bill a few hours by now!
  • Shelldean
    Shelldean Posts: 2,422 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Yeah.  Think I'd be inclined to draw a line under it too.

    Unless you or your husband wants to track them down and charge a finder's fee!  The two of you must be able to bill a few hours by now!
    Definitely drawing a line underneath the whole thing, the latest email is below. And they're sticking to the blood relative stance.

    This is what I've received........

    I can confirm when we are notified of a shareholders passing and we are advised probate is not required for the estate, our small estate will be the next steps. The small estate form is completed by the next of kin or executors of the late shareholders estate. when the next of kin passes away and the shares have not been transferred the shares will still be a part of the late shareholder’s estate and a new next of kin would need to complete the form as the form has been to signed by a blood relative of the shareholder hence why the it will not be completed or transferred into his wife’s name

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.