Advice needed on next steps - HX Car Park Management - Site 1085 Salterhebbble Halifax HX3 0QE

PCN_BoBeB

I`ve not included anything regarding predatory tactics -  IPC 27 "professional standards" in this case the claimants operative hides in an unmarked car and takes pictures of vehicles. Is it worth putting something in to cover this? I have such evidence of this.

Fruitcake

PCN_BoBeB said:

I`ve not included anything regarding predatory tactics -  IPC 27 "professional standards" in this case the claimants operative hides in an unmarked car and takes pictures of vehicles. Is it worth putting something in to cover this? I have such evidence of this.

You could include it then expand by saying the scamtendant had the opportunity to warn the driver not to park but neglected to do so.

Have a look at this case where the judge addressed this very point. It was an appeal court case so is persuasive on the lower courts.

index.php (pepipoo.com)

Look at the wording from near the bottom of page 7 to about the middle of page 8, especially para 21 of page 8 to the top of page 9.

You also need to write the full name of the International Parking Community followed by its abbreviation the fist time you use it, then just the abbreviation afterwards. The same applies to other abbreviations as well.

1505grandad

Just checking  -  was the date of the parking event after 1.11.2019?

PCN_BoBeB

1505grandad said:

Just checking  -  was the date of the parking event after 1.11.2019?

For the sake of argument 1, lets assume it was - what are your thoughts?
 And for the sake of argument 2, let’s assume it wasn’t - what are your thoughts?

If you are wondering - The relevant COP has been reviewed for the alleged incident.

KeithP

An alternative question might be: are you reading the right version of the ATA's CoP?

PCN_BoBeB

KeithP said:

An alternative question might be: are you reading the right version of the ATA's CoP?

Yes v7 - I’m although happy to be corrected otherwise if I’ve made a mistake in this matter.

KeithP

PCN_BoBeB said:

KeithP said:

An alternative question might be: are you reading the right version of the ATA's CoP?

Yes v7 - I’m although happy to be corrected otherwise if I’ve made a mistake in this matter.

Well no-one can offer that correction (or otherwise) without the answer to @1505grandad's question.

PCN_BoBeB

KeithP said:

PCN_BoBeB said:

KeithP said:

An alternative question might be: are you reading the right version of the ATA's CoP?

Yes v7 - I’m although happy to be corrected otherwise if I’ve made a mistake in this matter.

Well no-one can offer that correction (or otherwise) without the answer to @1505grandad's question.

The alleged incident on the PCN is dated after 01/11/2019

PCN_BoBeB

Defence filed.
shock horror, they’ve offered mediation.

KeithP

PCN_BoBeB said:

Defence filed.
shock horror, they’ve offered mediation.

And who is 'they'? The court or the claimant?