Southampton Town Quay, Parking Eye

pinheadplanet

Initial appeal was rejected by Parking Eye as expected, do I just make the same representation to Popla now or does it need any further evidence?

Le_Kirk

For POPLA you use all the points that you will find in the NEWBIE third post.

KeithP

pinheadplanet said:

Initial appeal was rejected by Parking Eye as expected, do I just make the same representation to Popla now or does it need any further evidence?

No, a PoPLA appeal is totally different.

Time now to be reading the third post of the NEWBIES thread.

Coupon-mad

pinheadplanet said:

Initial appeal was rejected by Parking Eye as expected, do I just make the same representation to Popla now or does it need any further evidence?

Obviously not the same. Sometimes I wonder, why did I bother to write an entire section on POPLA with template wording examples, and instructions on how to put the appeal in, the 2,000 words question, the fact you only click ''OTHER'' et al, in the 3rd post of the NEWBIES thread if people don't read it.

pinheadplanet

Coupon-mad said:

pinheadplanet said:

Initial appeal was rejected by Parking Eye as expected, do I just make the same representation to Popla now or does it need any further evidence?

Obviously not the same. Sometimes I wonder, why did I bother to write an entire section on POPLA with template wording examples, and instructions on how to put the appeal in, the 2,000 words question, the fact you only click ''OTHER'' et al, in the 3rd post of the NEWBIES thread if people don't read it.

"Sometimes I wonder, why..." It's because you care :-) You'll have to forgive me, I'm not accustomed to this subject as much as you are, so it's all new and it's quite demanding looking at dozens of different references to try to bring it all together into an appeal that will give a successful outcome. Thanks for everyones help in guiding us in the right direction.

pinheadplanet

I'mtrying to post the appeal here but it won't let me, probably because it's too long. I tried taking out the images but still no joy...

Umkomaas

pinheadplanet said:

I'mtrying to post the appeal here but it won't let me, probably because it's too long. I tried taking out the images but still no joy...

Split it up over a number of posts ......

pinheadplanet

Maybe this'll work, it is a very shortened version just outlining the points without all the detail included:

1). This Parking Charge Notice was issued outside of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 timescale - Schedule 4, Paragraph 9 (4 and 5) clearly states that this must be within 14 days. This Parking Charge Notice was served 64 days after the alleged ‘Date of Event’ and therefore a full 50 days beyond its relevant notice period.

Please see highlighted below the relevant section from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012:

2). Parking at this site is subject to Associated British Ports Southampton Harbour Byelaws 2003 (“the ABP Byelaws”); this location is therefore not relevant land for the purposes of POFA 2012.

3). No Evidence of Landowner Authority - the operator is put to strict proof of full compliance with the BPA Code of Practice

4). Failure to comply with the data protection 'ICO Code of Practice' applicable to ANPR (no
information about SAR rights, no privacy statement, no evaluation to justify that 24/7 ANPR enforcement at this site is justified, fair and proportionate). A serious BPA CoP breach

5). No Planning Permission from Southampton City Council for Pole-Mounted ANPR Cameras and no Advertising Consent for signage

Umkomaas

4 and 5 are a waste of time, POPLA won't adjudicate on them .... they never have. 

pinheadplanet

I thought 5 was a big deal seeing as it amounts to issuing tickets 'illegally', I thought was my main defence