Help/Advice needed regarding PCN

Hot_chocolate20

nosferatu1001 said:

If someone calls YOU, why arent you verifying THEM?! Seriously...

Yes Rookie error on my part upon reflection 🤦‍♂️

Hot_chocolate20

Coupon-mad said:

Stop engaging with them.  You are not required to make offers and your case has not changed.  They may well discontinue so sit on your hands as regards replying to them and tell them to get lost if they phone you again. 

Horrible company to deal with, truly a pariah on the public, these robo-claim legal firms.  A waste of a law degree.

Concentrate on getting your WS & evidence together and show us.

Thanks - I'll not engage with the email and block them from having any further calls. Once I've completed my WS I'll upload it on here for feedback 👍

Hot_chocolate20

Hi All,
Please find attached my WS - any feedback welcomed. I received the claimants one today via email.
I have until Friday 4pm to send it via email and Thursday 1pm to post it.

Thanks

Hot_chocolate20

Hot_chocolate20 said:

Hi All,
Please find attached my WS - any feedback welcomed. I received the claimants one today via email.
I have until Friday 4pm to send it via email and Thursday 1pm to post it.

Thanks

It seems I'm unable to upload it - the file format is  'unsupported'. Any ideas? It's a MS word doc 🤷‍♂️

Umkomaas

Host it on Dropbox or imgur. 

Hot_chocolate20

Please see the enclosed link containing my WS 
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=83B5FD9A4030D10D!4317&ithint=file,docx&authkey=!AFkAwQu96rvr_Q0

Umkomaas

Hot_chocolate20 said:

Please see the enclosed link containing my WS 
https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?resid=83B5FD9A4030D10D!4317&ithint=file,docx&authkey=!AFkAwQu96rvr_Q0

The question I always ask when I see the documents someone submits to the court, running into a massive word count, as far as an extremely busy Judge having to read thousands upon thousands of words, would this be more or less beneficial to my case?

Think about it. 

1505grandad

The claimant?:-

Bank Park Management Limited

WWW.BANKPARK.CO.UK

So it would be wise to refer to the relevant AoS   -   they are IPC members yet reference to the BPA CoP is stated many times. 

KeithP

In paras 23 and 24 you mention CRA 2015. There is no previous mention of that Act.
It is introduced properly much later - in para 35.

Para 43 starts: 43. The Defendant appends with this bundle, a fully detailed costs assessment which also covers proportionate costs.
I wouldn't call Exhibit XX-19 fully detailed.
I suggest that even a Costs Schedule for ordinary costs should be far more detailed than yours.
Don't forget to take a payslip, or something similar, to the hearing to prove your loss of earnings.

Coupon-mad

In paras 23 and 24 you mention CRA 2015. There is no previous mention of that Act.
It is introduced properly much later - in para 35.

What Keith means is, the first time you mention an Act, put it in full but with ('CRA 2015') in brackets immediately after, to signify that later mentions will call the Act that.  Your version has that back to front.