We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
How can a third party - 'the keeper' be responsible for someone else's alleged contract?
Totum20
Posts: 13 Forumite
Hi,
First, thanks for the fantastic "Newbies thread", I am following it closely with after receiving an NTK.
Second, the legislation in POFA2012 states that the creditor has the right to claim from the keeper.
I would argue however that a third party, the keeper, has no legal obligation to a contract allegedly entered into by others. I also question how a contract can be allegedly entered into if one party, the driver, is not known to the other party?
Does anyone have thoughts or experience of using this as an appeal?
First, thanks for the fantastic "Newbies thread", I am following it closely with after receiving an NTK.
Second, the legislation in POFA2012 states that the creditor has the right to claim from the keeper.
I would argue however that a third party, the keeper, has no legal obligation to a contract allegedly entered into by others. I also question how a contract can be allegedly entered into if one party, the driver, is not known to the other party?
Does anyone have thoughts or experience of using this as an appeal?
0
Comments
-
The 'legal obligation' is enshrined in the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (Schedule 4) - the law of this country. Like many laws there are those who disagree with them. Your MP is the starting point to have any law changed.Although mob violence managed to condemn the Poll Tax to the history books!Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street5 -
If this will be the first appeal, just use the blue text appeal in the NEWBIE sticky first post, send it with no additions, deletions or amendments. If the driver is not known to the PPC, it is more difficult for them to hold the keeper liable.5
-
Liability changed due to POFA 2012 , providing the claimant complies with that law (it is not a mandatory law , but optional , so not complying is if more relevance to your argument )
POFA makes the vehicle keeper liable for what that vehicle does , even if the keeper is not the driver , unless the keeper transfers that liability to the actual driver by naming them to the parking company , which is why they ask for driver details in the NTK
Feel free to debate it in court with a judge , thousands already have done so over the last 8 years4 -
"I would argue however that a third party, the keeper, has no legal obligation to a contract allegedly entered into by others. I also question how a contract can be allegedly entered into if one party, the driver, is not known to the other party?"
Simple
THe law says you are.
Unless you can stump up £30k for a judicial review, you havent got a hope in hell of challenging this law.3 -
I am doing this thanks. My only question regarding the text is the relevance to my situation. The NTK says the vehicle was "Present on an access road, without a written permission." No PDT and no references to time periods.Le_Kirk said:If this will be the first appeal, just use the blue text appeal in the NEWBIE sticky first post, send it with no additions, deletions or amendments. If the driver is not known to the PPC, it is more difficult for them to hold the keeper liable.
Basically, I believe the only avenue for appeal is questioning their right to be enforcing the area and the justification of the £100 fee.
I will be following all other advice as best practice to see where it leads out of principle
0 -
which PPC? and where ? pleaseRalph
2 -
There will probably be other avenues, boulevards, main roads, and possibly even a few side streets.Totum20 said:
I am doing this thanks. My only question regarding the text is the relevance to my situation. The NTK says the vehicle was "Present on an access road, without a written permission." No PDT and no references to time periods.Le_Kirk said:If this will be the first appeal, just use the blue text appeal in the NEWBIE sticky first post, send it with no additions, deletions or amendments. If the driver is not known to the PPC, it is more difficult for them to hold the keeper liable.
Basically, I believe the only avenue for appeal is questioning their right to be enforcing the area and the justification of the £100 fee.
I will be following all other advice as best practice to see where it leads out of principle
Inadequate signage and NTK PoFA failures to name but two. Have you checked that the NTK is in fact PoFA compliant in both wording and timeline in order to hold a keeper liable.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks2 -
Thanks for askingRalph-y said:which PPC? and where ? pleaseRalph
Alliance Parking. Swansea. I believe alliance have a contract with an, as yet, elusive landowner for a marked bay car park, but apparently the PCN was issued on an access road to the car park that until earlier this year had no signage on it.1 -
If you tell us the location, someone here may have information about it.Totum20 said:
Thanks for askingRalph-y said:which PPC? and where ? pleaseRalph
Alliance Parking. Swansea. I believe alliance have a contract with an, as yet, elusive landowner for a marked bay car park, but apparently the PCN was issued on an access road to the car park that until earlier this year had no signage on it.
When did the signage change? How long afterwards did the alleged event take place? The scammers should allow a bedding in period after any change before PCNs are issued.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.
All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks3 -
Is it the Copper Quarter? Old Millennium Security stomping ground. Alliance have subsumed all their contracts. If it is the CQ, do some searches on the forum which might turn up who the landowner is.Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street4
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards



