PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Home insurance if there's an unregulated extension

Hi all
I'm in the middle of buying a house. The surveyor has come back to say the kitchen extension had no planning permission and wouldn't meet the regs (lack of insulation).
However, the extension was done a fair while ago (perhaps 15 years?) so my main issue is insurance. Will the lack of regulation invalidate any home insurance policy? I asked DirectLine and they said they wouldn't insure a home which didn't have the right planning permission. I can't seem to find any other details online from other providers and their call centres are, as ever, understaffed.

Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
Eric

Comments

  • greatcrested
    greatcrested Posts: 5,925 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 June 2020 at 6:18PM
    Never heard of claims being rejected. Or of insurers checking on historic planning consents. I would not worry.
    But ask on the insurance board here?
    And just because it would meet today's Building Regs standards does not mean it did not 15+ years ago.
    My house certainly does not meet any of the current standards, but in 1851 when it was built it was fully compliant.
  • MysteryMe
    MysteryMe Posts: 3,391 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Did the extension actually need planning permission? It may have come within permitted development.
  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,793 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper

    There shouldn't be any problem with insurance.

    If it was an issue, the insurer's would have a question on their proposal form about planning and/or building regs - and/or an exclusion in their policy wording.

    But... buildings insurance never covers problems resulting from bad workmanship or bad materials (irrelevant of whether planning or building regs exist). You'd get a survey to investigate that.
  • eddddy said:
    But... buildings insurance never covers problems resulting from bad workmanship or bad materials (irrelevant of whether planning or building regs exist). You'd get a survey to investigate that.
    Yes, our first survey recommended investigating the lintel above the door but didn't raise any other structural concerns (though it wasn't the fullest type of survey). 
  • Jeepers_Creepers
    Jeepers_Creepers Posts: 4,339 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 29 June 2020 at 9:59PM
    "DirectLine and they said they wouldn't insure a home which didn't have the right planning permission." Blimey.

    As far as I can recall, I have never ever ever been asked by any insurance company whether any part of any of my property hasn't had PP or been signed orf. 
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 June 2020 at 10:19PM
    "DirectLine and they said they wouldn't insure a home which didn't have the right planning permission." Blimey.
    Absolute nonsense. This is what happens if you allow call centre droids to deviate off-script. Bet they don't even know what planning permission is.
    It seems to be a common urban myth that "you won't be able to get insurance" for alterations if they don't have the right paperwork, but nobody has ever been able to find evidence to back it up. As above though, standard buildings insurance isn't going to sort any defects which there might be.
  • I  suppose my problem is: if there was a fire and part of the building was unregulated, would the insurers still pay out? Or would they just say to me that since the extension doesn't meet building regs, they won't give anything?
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I  suppose my problem is: if there was a fire and part of the building was unregulated, would the insurers still pay out? Or would they just say to me that since the extension doesn't meet building regs, they won't give anything?
    They won't care. It's not relevant.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 30 June 2020 at 12:03PM
    I  suppose my problem is: if there was a fire and part of the building was unregulated, would the insurers still pay out? Or would they just say to me that since the extension doesn't meet building regs, they won't give anything?
    You didn't say it doesn't meet building regs, you said the insulation doesn't meet current building regs. It may well have met them at the time of construction, and there is no requirement to update them subsequently. If there was, half the housing stock of the UK would be uninsurable.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • greatcrested
    greatcrested Posts: 5,925 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    macman said:
    I  suppose my problem is: if there was a fire and part of the building was unregulated, would the insurers still pay out? Or would they just say to me that since the extension doesn't meet building regs, they won't give anything?
    You didn't say it doesn't meet building regs, you said the insulation doesn't meet current building regs. It may well have met them at the time of construction, and there is no requirement to update them subsequently. If there was, half 90% of the housing stock of the UK would be uninsurable.
    ..................................................................................
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 255.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.