We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Parking Charge Notice from CPM - claim dropped

1234579

Comments

  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    D_P_Dance said:
    L am open to corrrection here but, imo,  posters here usually have very little cause/need to send WP offers
    You're
     probably right, but I couldn't see any harm in it.
    The 'harm' is that you have restricted yourself by being unable to mention that letter in court except when the issue of costs is being discussed.
  • D_P_Dance said:
    It may have unforeseen legal consequences. 
    Such as? 

    Le_Kirk said:
    D_P_Dance said:
    L am open to correction here but, imo,  posters here usually have very little cause/need to send WP offers
    You're probably right, but I couldn't see any harm in it.
    The harm (if you can call it that) is that you cannot use it in your hearing, except when it comes to costs.
    It doesn't contain any information that wouldn't be included in my defence, and the letter in an of itself would have little bearing on any judgement, as far as I can see. 
  • Scrapit
    Scrapit Posts: 2,304 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    pould said:
    Scrapit said:
    Its not sapmming as there is no business to promote. But id take a thanks with a pinch of salt.
    It's not you who's spamming
    Its not the old boy either.
  • KeithP said:
    D_P_Dance said:
    L am open to corrrection here but, imo,  posters here usually have very little cause/need to send WP offers
    You're
     probably right, but I couldn't see any harm in it.
    The 'harm' is that you have restricted yourself by being unable to mention that letter in court except when the issue of costs is being discussed.
    Why
     would I need to?
  • KeithP
    KeithP Posts: 41,296 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I am just saying that by using those words you have placed an extra restriction upon yourself.
    My original question was why would you want to place that restriction upon yourself. 
    That's all.
  • I see, more of a psychological thing than anything else. Let them know that I'm ready to go to court, that I expect to win, and I expect to be awarded costs.

    Hopefully they will s*** or get off the pot.
  • Just a thought, but in processing the keepers personal data and by handing it over to a debt collection company, when they know full well that the keeper has no liability for the PCN, has the PPC breached the DPA/Gdpr?
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,641 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    One to put to the ICO. They are very helpful apparently. 
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • Excellent, next on the todo list.
  • pould
    pould Posts: 252 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 1 June 2020 at 9:04AM
    Just a thought, but in processing the keepers personal data and by handing it over to a debt collection company, when they know full well that the keeper has no liability for the PCN, has the PPC breached the DPA/Gdpr?
    I will be testing this very point in front of a judge.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.