We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Totally shafted by HMRC and the SEISS


My husband's 18-19 tax return was £300 over the threshold. Utter rubbish that they say they will look at the other 2 tax years and take an average from the last 3 - they don't - even though the 2 previous tax years earned him £30k.
They only go by the 18-19 tax return. Utterly pointless promises made by the government. No surprise there then.
Let's all get back to work. Best of luck to the self employed- even if the self employed get any more 'support' (they are thinking of not paying out again), they are revising the threshold down to 30k for the next payment. Good luck folks.
Comments
-
deliclare said:Well we won't be getting a penny.
My husband's 18-19 tax return was £300 over the threshold. Utter rubbish that they say they will look at the other 2 tax years and take an average from the last 3 - they don't - even though the 2 previous tax years earned him £30k.
They only go by the 18-19 tax return. Utterly pointless promises made by the government. No surprise there then.deliclare said:.., they are revising the threshold down to 30k for the next payment. Good luck folks.Information I post is for England unless otherwise stated. Some rules may be different in other parts of UK.0 -
That is wrong. The legislation is clear. Based on what you have said, your husband is eligible by meeting Condition B (I assume he is not within the loan charge):
5.1 The profits condition is met if- (a) where the person is not subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition A, B or C, or
(b) where the person is subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition D or E.
5.2 Condition A is met if-
(a) the person’s trading profits of the tax year 2018-19 were £50,000 or less but were more than nil, and
(b) those profits are equal to or more than the person’s relevant income in that tax year.
5.3 Condition B is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of those tax years was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
5.4 Condition C is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 but did not carry on a trade in the tax year 2016-17,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
Could the 50% test be in point?1 -
calcotti said:deliclare said:Well we won't be getting a penny.
My husband's 18-19 tax return was £300 over the threshold. Utter rubbish that they say they will look at the other 2 tax years and take an average from the last 3 - they don't - even though the 2 previous tax years earned him £30k.
They only go by the 18-19 tax return. Utterly pointless promises made by the government. No surprise there then.deliclare said:.., they are revising the threshold down to 30k for the next payment. Good luck folks.
My husband spoke to them today. They are saying categorically that because 18-19 was over the threshold (the 2 previous years were well under) they are NOT paying us anything.
0 -
My husband spoke to them today. They are saying categorically that because 18-19 was over the threshold (the 2 previous years were well under) they are NOT paying us anything
0 -
Jeremy535897 said:That is wrong. The legislation is clear. Based on what you have said, your husband is eligible by meeting Condition B (I assume he is not within the loan charge):
5.1 The profits condition is met if- (a) where the person is not subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition A, B or C, or
(b) where the person is subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition D or E.
5.2 Condition A is met if-
(a) the person’s trading profits of the tax year 2018-19 were £50,000 or less but were more than nil, and
(b) those profits are equal to or more than the person’s relevant income in that tax year.
5.3 Condition B is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of those tax years was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
5.4 Condition C is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 but did not carry on a trade in the tax year 2016-17,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
Could the 50% test be in point?
They are saying categorically that because 18-19 tax return was 50,300 he is not eligible. Despite being well under for the previous 2 tax years.0 -
deliclare said:Jeremy535897 said:That is wrong. The legislation is clear. Based on what you have said, your husband is eligible by meeting Condition B (I assume he is not within the loan charge):
5.1 The profits condition is met if- (a) where the person is not subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition A, B or C, or
(b) where the person is subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition D or E.
5.2 Condition A is met if-
(a) the person’s trading profits of the tax year 2018-19 were £50,000 or less but were more than nil, and
(b) those profits are equal to or more than the person’s relevant income in that tax year.
5.3 Condition B is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of those tax years was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
5.4 Condition C is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 but did not carry on a trade in the tax year 2016-17,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
Could the 50% test be in point?
They are saying categorically that because 18-19 tax return was 50,300 he is not eligible. Despite being well under for the previous 2 tax years.
Here is the guidance and this is why your husband is ineligible
To work out your eligibility we will first look at your 2018 to 2019 Self Assessment tax return. Your trading profits must be no more than £50,000 and at least equal to your non-trading income.
Sorry, but remember its the Treasury and the Government who have set the rules, HMRC implement them.0 -
antonic said:deliclare said:Jeremy535897 said:That is wrong. The legislation is clear. Based on what you have said, your husband is eligible by meeting Condition B (I assume he is not within the loan charge):
5.1 The profits condition is met if- (a) where the person is not subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition A, B or C, or
(b) where the person is subject to the loan charge, the person meets condition D or E.
5.2 Condition A is met if-
(a) the person’s trading profits of the tax year 2018-19 were £50,000 or less but were more than nil, and
(b) those profits are equal to or more than the person’s relevant income in that tax year.
5.3 Condition B is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2018-19,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of those tax years was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
5.4 Condition C is met if-
(a) the person carried on a trade in the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 but did not carry on a trade in the tax year 2016-17,
(b) the average amount of the person’s trading profits of the tax years 2017-18 and 2018-19 was £50,000 or less but was more than nil, and
(c) the sum of those profits is equal to or more than the sum of the person’s relevant income for those tax years.
Could the 50% test be in point?
They are saying categorically that because 18-19 tax return was 50,300 he is not eligible. Despite being well under for the previous 2 tax years.
Here is the guidance and this is why your husband is ineligible
To work out your eligibility we will first look at your 2018 to 2019 Self Assessment tax return. Your trading profits must be no more than £50,000 and at least equal to your non-trading income.
Sorry, but remember its the Treasury and the Government who have set the rules, HMRC implement them.
The next bit says 'If you’re not eligible based on the 2018 to 2019 Self Assessment tax return, we will then look at the tax years 2016 to 2017, 2017 to 2018, and 2018 to 2019.' So still seems worth pursuing.
But a banker, engaged at enormous expense,Had the whole of their cash in his care.
Lewis Carroll0 -
antonic said:deliclare said:
Here is the guidance and this is why your husband is ineligible
To work out your eligibility we will first look at your 2018 to 2019 Self Assessment tax return. Your trading profits must be no more than £50,000 and at least equal to your non-trading income.
Sorry, but remember its the Treasury and the Government who have set the rules, HMRC implement them."To work out your eligibility we will first look at your 2018 to 2019 Self Assessment tax return. Your trading profits must be no more than £50,000 and at least equal to your non-trading income.
If you’re not eligible based on the 2018 to 2019 Self Assessment tax return, we will then look at the tax years 2016 to 2017, 2017 to 2018, and 2018 to 2019."
It looks as though the HMRC have read the first paragraph and then stopped. Or followed that process looking at the earlier years but found another reason to decline. So, the web site continues:
"Find out how we will work out your eligibility including if we have to use other years." The OP should use this link to investigate further.
1 -
The legislation is more important than any guidance, although as Theoretica says, the guidance allows the claim anyway. The legislation is here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/882593/SEISS_Direction_Final_-_SIGNED.pdf
The profits condition is in paragraph 5.0 -
deliclare said:Well we won't be getting a penny.
My husband's 18-19 tax return was £300 over the threshold. Utter rubbish that they say they will look at the other 2 tax years and take an average from the last 3 - they don't - even though the 2 previous tax years earned him £30k.
They only go by the 18-19 tax return. Utterly pointless promises made by the government. No surprise there then.
Let's all get back to work. Best of luck to the self employed- even if the self employed get any more 'support' (they are thinking of not paying out again), they are revising the threshold down to 30k for the next payment. Good luck folks.November make £10/day challenge = £874.14/£300
December make £10/day challenge = £98.10/£1552
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards