We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Milk over backseats
Comments
-
Surely they'd self-insure for stuff like that? What would be the point of a big supermarket claim making an insurance claim every time they pay out a few quid?thomasf5 said:
the company won’t even be paying out of pocket. They have small claims insurance for issues up to around £250.Aylesbury_Duck said:No, Morrisons need not accept liability. Transportation is your responsibility. No use crying over it.0 -
In order to claim for the valet you'd have to show:
1) Morrisons owed you a duty of care
2) They were negligently in breach of that duty
3) The breach caused the loss
4) The loss was not too remote
While 1 may be a given, I think you will struggle with the rest. Particularly 2.
Even if done under breach of contract, you'd need to prove the goods didn't conform, the lack of conformity caused the damage and that it was foreseeable. Which again, I think you'd struggle with on all points.
I would also presume you had the full thing valeted and not just the stained area. So I can understand morrisons reluctance - particularly given the car doesn't look like it's been cleaned in years. Not a dig, to explain....It would be a bit like having a banger that has a few dents already getting a new dent (perhaps from another vehicles door) and asking the other driver to pay for a new panel & respray from a top end garage. In those circumstances, they'd more than likely just get the difference in value between the car with 5 dents and the car with 6 dents.You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride0 -
Why wouldn't you keep milk upright when transporting it?
It's one of the first 'common sense' things I noticed when picking up shopping - always make sure anything with the potential to stink your car out if spilled doesn't get the chance to spill in the first place.
It's a bit of a pain, but I always ask a passenger to carry it / prop it up with the other bags etc. A bit of mitigation and foresight would have prevented this.
Sorry, but I'm with Morrisons here - how do they know you didn't just break the seal and spill it yourself because you fancied new seats?1 -
Even with the foil off, if the lid was on and it was secured for transportation then it would not have leaked.
This leads me to believe that the problem comes down to either the milk not being secured properly when driving, or an erratic driving style that has caused the milk to topple.
I think the proportion of blame lies with the OP here.
Mop it up and move on.
Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)1 -
The screw cap lids are not designed to be liquid tight, although the contents of the bottle shouldn't flood out if the foil is removed - rather it may drip out. However it is quite easy for a greater leakage to occur if the foil isn't sealed, especially if the screw cap is cross-threaded. As I mentioned yesterday, I've had spillage from a "sealed" bottle of milk (usually when it is on its side in the fridge) at least twice a year for as long as I can remember. I'm sure I'm not unique and the only person this happens to, so it shows that this is not an unusual situation.pinkshoes said:Even with the foil off, if the lid was on and it was secured for transportation then it would not have leaked.
But the "secured for transportation" is the important point so I still don't think the OP has any reasonable claim against Ms.3 -
Further to Unholy Angel's post (and other posts), I would suspect Morrisons would question whether you had taken all reasonable steps to avoid or minimise your losses. I am probably wrong but at the back of my mind there is a case where in the supplier of a product demonstrated that whilst their product did have faults (in that scenario), the buyer had failed to demonstrate reasonable care and the supplier won. Ironically if the milk spill was on the floor of the footwell, which tends to be flatter you might have had a stronger arguement.May you find your sister soon Helli.
Sleep well.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
