UKPC NTK

Umkomaas

Once it's past 56 days after the day after the parking event with no compliant NtK served, they are up the creek without a paddle - as POPLA will eventually tell them in their decision following your POPLA appeal. 

Appeal to UKPC once past 56 days

Tea_biscuits

Redx said:

unlikely, a keeper has 28 days to appeal an NTK , so maybe appeal in 16 days or so ?

Does the RK appeal now or wait until day 26/27 or does this not have any relevance? 

Fruitcake

Appeal now as already advised. Include a one liner if you wish that the NTK is non PoFA compliant (double check as you have not shown us the back of the NTK).

If/when it is rejected, appeal to PoPLA as already advised.

Please answer the questions you have already been asked. 

Redx

I would appeal on friday 22 may personally , as keeper, using the blue text template and adding a short paragraph stating that UKPC have failed to comply with POFA so as keeper you have no liability and they should cancel the pcn

Fruitcake

Redx said:

I would appeal on friday 22 may personally , as keeper, using the blue text template and adding a short paragraph stating that UKPC have failed to comply with POFA so as keeper you have no liability and they should cancel the pcn

Why wait? 

Tea_biscuits

Fruitcake said:

Appeal now as already advised. Include a one liner if you wish that the NTK is non PoFA compliant (double check as you have not shown us the back of the NTK).

If/when it is rejected, appeal to PoPLA as already advised.

Please answer the questions you have already been asked. 

Redx

Fruitcake said:

Redx said:

I would appeal on friday 22 may personally , as keeper, using the blue text template and adding a short paragraph stating that UKPC have failed to comply with POFA so as keeper you have no liability and they should cancel the pcn

Why wait? 

why not ? , no rush , so appeal before day 28 , usually around day 25 , so 22 may is a friday with a weekend in the way , the OP asked what I would do, that is what I would do , other opinions are available , ask 10 people and you will get 10 different opinions, I have mine , I did not query anyone elses opinion

in any case POPLA is on furlough with no new cases being heard , so string it out

Tea_biscuits

Fruitcake said:

Appeal again using the template in blue from the NEWBIES and await a PoPLA code. 
Complain to the BPA that the original appeal from the keeper was ignored.

Compare the NTK line by line against the strict requirements of the PoFA to see if it is capable of transferring liability to the keeper. Construct a PoPLA appeal using all the relevant template points from the third post of the NEWBIERS and post the draft here for checking before you submit it.

What happened when the keeper complained to the landowner?
If the keeper is a resident of the place where the alleged event occurred, what does their lease/AST say about parking, permits, court etcetera? What it doesn't say is just as important.
If the driver was visiting a resident, what does and doesn't the resident's lease/AST say.

Has the keeper complained to their MP yet about this unregulated scam?

The keeper did not know who land owner was so didn't complain, driver is not a resident and not visiting a resident either. 
The registered keeper has not yet complained to their MP

KeithP

Tea_biscuits, your latest post again tells the world who was driving.

Suggest you urgently edit that post.

Please take care.

Fruitcake

The OP is already past day 56 so I see no real advantage in waiting, but as you say, there is no rush as long as this second appeal is done before day 28 from issue of the NTK.

I still think the OP should complain to the BPA because their initial keeper appeal was ignored.