We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
More than 70 per cent of high street law firms face closure
Comments
-
I find this difficult to believe. Work must be piling up, conveyancing, divorces, evictions, bankruptcies, repossessions, and thousand of people suing the NHS/HMG for incompetence, not to mention Meghan.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.1
-
I read recently that some law firms were offering their staff a sabbatical of three months at 30% of full pay or 40% of full pay if they did some pro bono work during this period.
This may be useful for a person who wishes is appealing a parking judgment or contesting an appeal made by the PPC.
Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.2 -
Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.1 -
I just wish that said more than 70% of private parking companies face closure.
When I was fighting my case I kept wishing that a great hole would open up and swallow Excel Parking Services and it would never be seen or heard of again.
Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.3 -
No parking company is immune to this, and no legal is immune especially those who operate on high volume, low cost claims. When retail outlets open again, the first sale of the day will make them a profit. With parking companies, from the day they issue a ticket it can take months to get the money. Of course some will pay but with more exposure being given in the media, more people will fight them and win. That could be 2-4 months down the line and all the time the PPC is starved of money.Snakes_Belly said:I just wish that said more than 70% of private parking companies face closure.
When I was fighting my case I kept wishing that a great hole would open up and swallow Excel Parking Services and it would never be seen or heard of again.
I think we will see some of the smaller companies close first and oddly, this virus, as nasty as it is, it will cull more companies than the new code of practice could ever achieve.
3 -
The majority of High Street solicitors rely on conveyancing as their bread and butter, and with very few property sales and lettings taking place at present, that income has virtually dried up. Evictions and repossessions are also on hold for the time being.D_P_Dance said:I find this difficult to believe. Work must be piling up, conveyancing, divorces, evictions, bankruptcies, repossessions, and thousand of people suing the NHS/HMG for incompetence, not to mention Meghan.
I also suspect that the number of private PCNs is down by more than 50%, as can be seen by the volume of new enquiries / threads on this forum, well below the usual rate. This may not immediately impact the likes of Gladstones and BW Legal, who will be dealing with court claims for tickets issued months / years ago, but it will catch up with them eventually.
I have been providing assistance, including Lay Representation at Court hearings (current score: won 57, lost 14), to defendants in parking cases for over 5 years. I have an LLB (Hons) degree, and have a Graduate Diploma in Civil Litigation from CILEx. However, any advice given on these forums by me is NOT formal legal advice, and I accept no liability for its accuracy.5 -
6 yrs in england and wales , 5 years in scotland , and with a much higher chance of getting default CCJ,s with much higher figures , and in multiple claim cases then getting the likes of DCBL involvedbargepole said:
The majority of High Street solicitors rely on conveyancing as their bread and butter, and with very few property sales and lettings taking place at present, that income has virtually dried up. Evictions and repossessions are also on hold for the time being.D_P_Dance said:I find this difficult to believe. Work must be piling up, conveyancing, divorces, evictions, bankruptcies, repossessions, and thousand of people suing the NHS/HMG for incompetence, not to mention Meghan.
I also suspect that the number of private PCNs is down by more than 50%, as can be seen by the volume of new enquiries / threads on this forum, well below the usual rate. This may not immediately impact the likes of Gladstones and BW Legal, who will be dealing with court claims for tickets issued months / years ago, but it will catch up with them eventually.3 -
The thing now is, whilst all the above still applies, this time last year, abuse of process was not heard about.twhitehousescat said:
6 yrs in england and wales , 5 years in scotland , and with a much higher chance of getting default CCJ,s with much higher figures , and in multiple claim cases then getting the likes of DCBL involvedbargepole said:
The majority of High Street solicitors rely on conveyancing as their bread and butter, and with very few property sales and lettings taking place at present, that income has virtually dried up. Evictions and repossessions are also on hold for the time being.D_P_Dance said:I find this difficult to believe. Work must be piling up, conveyancing, divorces, evictions, bankruptcies, repossessions, and thousand of people suing the NHS/HMG for incompetence, not to mention Meghan.
I also suspect that the number of private PCNs is down by more than 50%, as can be seen by the volume of new enquiries / threads on this forum, well below the usual rate. This may not immediately impact the likes of Gladstones and BW Legal, who will be dealing with court claims for tickets issued months / years ago, but it will catch up with them eventually.
When Judge Taylor spanked BWLegal in Southampton, it is spreading to other courts and will continue to spread around the country. I am sure there are many cases that are struck out that we never hear about
The seed was sowed months ago and is now blooming so the question is .... how many spankings can these legals take as each time they lose money4 -
60-70% of tickets are paid after first reminder , hundreds of people get default ccj,s with added costs , very few people or judges know or understand "abuse of process"4
-
twhitehousescat said:60-70% of tickets are paid after first reminder , hundreds of people get default ccj,s with added costs , very few people or judges know or understand "abuse of process"
If such a percentage was true, boy are they suffering now and in the Southampton case, the OP, had never heard of abuse of process until DJ Taylor said so, news to us as well. It does not follow that anyone should know about abuse of process but if the clued up judge does all the better and you know, since last year more and more judges are spanking away or deducting the fake amount. What we don't know right now is how many but suffice to say, it is a 100% more than this time last year. Bad for dodgy legals and good for the motorist.twhitehousescat said:60-70% of tickets are paid after first reminder , hundreds of people get default ccj,s with added costs , very few people or judges know or understand "abuse of process"
And about the CCJ problem, we all know that Theresa May told a pack of lies3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 262K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
