We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Has the dead cat finished bouncing?
Comments
-
Anyone taking a bet on heads (one wave) vs tails (second wave) has completely missed the point that there are many other sides to that coin. The virus could disappear tomorrow or it could linger as a single wave for years or pretty much anything else between. Fortunately the market prices in the possibilities.bowlhead99 said:
There might be a second wave or there might not be. If there is, stock markets might fall or they might not. As both are 50:50, the chance of getting a second wave and it being bad for stocks, is only 50% x 50% = 25%. So, more likely than not, it's all fine.Sailtheworld said:
That's two predictions for the price of one. The first is that there will be a second wave and the second that stock markets will crash.quirkydeptless said:Stock market vs Second Wave
The only takeaway from this thread (26 pages in it should be clear) is that the future is difficult to predict as is the market response to that future.
[ducks]
0 -
badger09 said:I'd like to think that guy survived, relatively unscathed.
However, he might have been very seriously injured, taking many years to recover to anything like his previous health
Goes with the territory I guess, like stock market investing, however he was OK...
https://wwos.nine.com.au/news/surfer-cartwheels-down-monster-waveRetired 1st July 2021.
This is not investment advice.
Your money may go "down and up and down and up and down and up and down ... down and up and down and up and down and up and down ... I got all tricked up and came up to this thing, lookin' so fire hot, a twenty out of ten..."0 -
Just to dispel one Facebook myth. The virus isn't going to disappear tomorrow.Sailtheworld said:
Anyone taking a bet on heads (one wave) vs tails (second wave) has completely missed the point that there are many other sides to that coin. The virus could disappear tomorrow or it could linger as a single wave for years or pretty much anything else between. Fortunately the market prices in the possibilities.bowlhead99 said:
There might be a second wave or there might not be. If there is, stock markets might fall or they might not. As both are 50:50, the chance of getting a second wave and it being bad for stocks, is only 50% x 50% = 25%. So, more likely than not, it's all fine.Sailtheworld said:
That's two predictions for the price of one. The first is that there will be a second wave and the second that stock markets will crash.quirkydeptless said:Stock market vs Second Wave
The only takeaway from this thread (26 pages in it should be clear) is that the future is difficult to predict as is the market response to that future.
[ducks]1 -
Using the same logic, an asteroid might hit the earth and wipe out all life this year, or it might not. Therefore it’s 50:50.bowlhead99 said:
There might be a second wave or there might not be. If there is, stock markets might fall or they might not. As both are 50:50, the chance of getting a second wave and it being bad for stocks, is only 50% x 50% = 25%. So, more likely than not, it's all fine.Sailtheworld said:
That's two predictions for the price of one. The first is that there will be a second wave and the second that stock markets will crash.quirkydeptless said:Stock market vs Second Wave
The only takeaway from this thread (26 pages in it should be clear) is that the future is difficult to predict as is the market response to that future.
[ducks]
However, on the basis of the earlier financial advice I’ve decided to buy myself a wet suit. Better safe than sorry.1 -
June 11 - June 24 / the investment strategy of quirkydeptless appears right about twice a month.
0 -
Probably not the best example. The chances of an asteroid wiping out all life this year (or even this century) are definitely a lot less than 50:50!BananaRepublic said:Using the same logic, an asteroid might hit the earth and wipe out all life this year, or it might not. Therefore it’s 50:50.
0 -
My 'both are 50:50' with a smiley was just a continuation of the meme from another thread last month where Username999 told us that all investing was a gamble, because you will either make a profit or a loss, ergo 50:50.BrockStoker said:
Probably not the best example. The chances of an asteroid wiping out all life this year (or even this century) are definitely a lot less than 50:50!BananaRepublic said:Using the same logic, an asteroid might hit the earth and wipe out all life this year, or it might not. Therefore it’s 50:50.
Which was swiftly followed up by the usual wags with "sign me up for the euromillions then, I'll either win it or I won't, 50:50", etc...5 -
I know. However, given recent protests and political nonsense I’m starting to think such an event might be an improvement.BrockStoker said:
Probably not the best example. The chances of an asteroid wiping out all life this year (or even this century) are definitely a lot less than 50:50!BananaRepublic said:Using the same logic, an asteroid might hit the earth and wipe out all life this year, or it might not. Therefore it’s 50:50.1 -
bowlhead99 said:My 'both are 50:50' with a smiley was just a continuation of the meme from another thread last month where Username999 told us that all investing was a gamble, because you will either make a profit or a loss, ergo 50:50.
Which was swiftly followed up by the usual wags with "sign me up for the euromillions then, I'll either win it or I won't, 50:50", etc...
Sorry. Missed the sarcasm, as usual.BananaRepublic said:I know. However, given recent protests and political nonsense I’m starting to think such an event might be an improvement.
2 -
Of course, almost certainly not, but thanks for missing the point about people missing the point.Thrugelmir said:
Just to dispel one Facebook myth. The virus isn't going to disappear tomorrow.Sailtheworld said:
Anyone taking a bet on heads (one wave) vs tails (second wave) has completely missed the point that there are many other sides to that coin. The virus could disappear tomorrow or it could linger as a single wave for years or pretty much anything else between. Fortunately the market prices in the possibilities.bowlhead99 said:
There might be a second wave or there might not be. If there is, stock markets might fall or they might not. As both are 50:50, the chance of getting a second wave and it being bad for stocks, is only 50% x 50% = 25%. So, more likely than not, it's all fine.Sailtheworld said:
That's two predictions for the price of one. The first is that there will be a second wave and the second that stock markets will crash.quirkydeptless said:Stock market vs Second Wave
The only takeaway from this thread (26 pages in it should be clear) is that the future is difficult to predict as is the market response to that future.
[ducks]1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
