We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
IAS appeal multiple tickets
Comments
-
So the signs say that you need a permit, but MA said that there is no permit system in place, and permits aren't mentioned at all in the PCN. I brought it up in my appeal to Link, and in their reply they addressed it by saying:Ralph-y said:so scammers say you must have a permit and MA say we are not giving any ?Ralph
"Your vehicle was not parked in the bay allocated to your property and it was not parked next to the plaque marked NUMBER. Your vehicle was not issued a charge due to a permit not being displayed. "
0 -
They can say whatever they like, they have to convince a judge that i) there was a contract in place. and ii) that you breached it.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
For sure. Do you think the fact that half of what is in the sign - and therefore the contract - is wrong means there was no contract in place?D_P_Dance said:They can say whatever they like, they have to convince a judge that i) there was a contract in place. and ii) that you breached it.0 -
That is for the Judge, I have not read the sign.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
I'm struggling to upload an image, so I'll transcribe the sign:
WARNING
PRIVATE LAND
CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT
Parking in this area is permitted for: Vehicles displaying a valid permit and parked within the confines of a marked bay.
By Parking or remaining at this site otherwise than in accordance with the above, you, the driver, are agreeing to the following contractual terms:
You agree to pay consideration in the form of a 'parking charge'in the sum of £100 to be paid within 28 days of issue. This is reduced to £60 if paid within 14 days.
You will be liable for additional parking charges for each and any subsequent 24 hour perido (or part thereof) that the vehicle remains of it returns at any time.
If the parking charge payment is not received within 28 days of issue, the vehicle keeper's details may be requested from the DVLA. Enforcement action may incur additional costs that will be added to the parking charge.
Photographic and video evidence may be taken.
Managed by:
Link Parking Ltd, PO BOX 36, Martock, TA12 6WL (Company number 8261355)
Tel: 0871 221 5919 www.linkparking.co.uk
Again, the I have written confirmation from the MA saying the following:
"I can confirm that there are no permits required. This sign was put up a while ago when permits were going to be introduced, however the decision was taken not to issue permits. "0 -
NEWBIES - HOW TO UPLOAD LINKS TO PHOTOS/SCANS TO MSETo upload a photo/scan link, you first need to host it on a free photo hosting site (like Dropbox, Imurg or Tinypic), copy the URL, paste it here, but change the http to hxxp and we'll do the conversion. Newbies can't directly upload links to photos/scans until they've a few posts under their belt.Ralph
1 -
No, half the sign not applying is irrelevant.So exactly where was the vehicle parked? You stated it was in the correct place, they say it wasn't.1
-
The vehicle was parked next to a curb, on which there's a plaque with the number of my flat. There's no markings on the ground. Around the entire property, some car spaces have markings on the ground and some don't. Furthermore, there are yellow chevrons painted on the ground next to certain curbs, I imagine to prohibit parking there, and there isn't any next to this curb. I will try and upload some pictures shortly.nosferatu1001 said:No, half the sign not applying is irrelevant.So exactly where was the vehicle parked? You stated it was in the correct place, they say it wasn't.0 -
"Your vehicle was not parked in the bay allocated to your property and it was not parked next to the plaque marked NUMBER. Your vehicle was not issued a charge due to a permit not being displayed. "That's not what they say, so you need to prove it. Obviously their photos must show something.0
-
Agreed. I have pictures I took, which I will upload in a sec, but have yet to see any pictures from them. They, of course, did not provide any evidence when rejecting the appeal.nosferatu1001 said:"Your vehicle was not parked in the bay allocated to your property and it was not parked next to the plaque marked NUMBER. Your vehicle was not issued a charge due to a permit not being displayed. "That's not what they say, so you need to prove it. Obviously their photos must show something.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
