We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
DCB legal for VCS. Witness statement due 9th April. Urgent help appreciated
Comments
-
For witness statements, the statement of truth’s wording will be as follows:D_P_Dance said:the point here being did DCBL add on a fake £70 AS THEY NORMALLY DO and have they signed a statement of truth stating the fake add on is lawful ?
Remind me, would that be contempt of court, or perjery?
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
This would surely mean that a witness statement with a signature stating that the unlawful of £60/£70 is lawful. Such a statement would go against what the courts are saying and then who was lying, the courts or the claimant0 -
CM,this is totally unacceptable in a Civil Court, it is highly uncivil. If I had been there I would have complained to the Bar Council. Did you?You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Viera90210 said:
I submitted an appeal using my details. So from there they are saying that is in effect admitting to being the driverLe_Kirk said:If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name? How did you receive court papers in your name?
But who is named on the court papers? In whose name did you (or anyone) submit the defence? Who completed the AoS and in whose name?Viera90210 said:
Registered keeper is a relative but not me nor have I ever been.?Le_Kirk said:If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name? How did you receive court papers in your name?
Reading the witness statement by Jake Burgess (there's a familiar name) he states that as the driver had not paid, they obtained the name and address of the registered keeper. Something is not right somewhere.0 -
All forms are in my name.Le_Kirk said:Viera90210 said:
I submitted an appeal using my details. So from there they are saying that is in effect admitting to being the driverLe_Kirk said:If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name? How did you receive court papers in your name?
But who is named on the court papers? In whose name did you (or anyone) submit the defence? Who completed the AoS and in whose name?Viera90210 said:
Registered keeper is a relative but not me nor have I ever been.?Le_Kirk said:If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name? How did you receive court papers in your name?
Reading the witness statement by Jake Burgess (there's a familiar name) he states that as the driver had not paid, they obtained the name and address of the registered keeper. Something is not right somewhere.0 -
So should I open with this?beamerguy said:
For witness statements, the statement of truth’s wording will be as follows:D_P_Dance said:the point here being did DCBL add on a fake £70 AS THEY NORMALLY DO and have they signed a statement of truth stating the fake add on is lawful ?
Remind me, would that be contempt of court, or perjery?
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
This would surely mean that a witness statement with a signature stating that the unlawful of £60/£70 is lawful. Such a statement would go against what the courts are saying and then who was lying, the courts or the claimant0 -
No, the point is to make the judge aware of the fake add on and what other courts have said.Viera90210 said:
So should I open with this?beamerguy said:
For witness statements, the statement of truth’s wording will be as follows:D_P_Dance said:the point here being did DCBL add on a fake £70 AS THEY NORMALLY DO and have they signed a statement of truth stating the fake add on is lawful ?
Remind me, would that be contempt of court, or perjery?
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
This would surely mean that a witness statement with a signature stating that the unlawful of £60/£70 is lawful. Such a statement would go against what the courts are saying and then who was lying, the courts or the claimant
If their signed statement of truth claims the fake £60 is a legitimate claim, that is time to refer the judge to the new Civil Procedure and let the judge take over1 -
OK, now how did you get claim forms if you are not the RK nor the driver as per your OP?Viera90210 said:
All forms are in my name.Le_Kirk said:Viera90210 said:
I submitted an appeal using my details. So from there they are saying that is in effect admitting to being the driverLe_Kirk said:If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name? How did you receive court papers in your name?
But who is named on the court papers? In whose name did you (or anyone) submit the defence? Who completed the AoS and in whose name?Viera90210 said:
Registered keeper is a relative but not me nor have I ever been.?Le_Kirk said:If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name? How did you receive court papers in your name?
Reading the witness statement by Jake Burgess (there's a familiar name) he states that as the driver had not paid, they obtained the name and address of the registered keeper. Something is not right somewhere.0 -
I appealed in my name by email but I didn't give them my address so not sure where they got that from.
The car is registered to my address but not with me as rk. Maybe they just made the assumption?
Is this something of significance in terms of a defence?0 -
To me it is a mess and it looks like the claimant is chasing the wrong person unless they are going after you as driver. I would make sure I laid it out with a timeline in the Witness Statement showing clearly how you got to this point and submitting, as evidence, the documentation you have received and sent.Viera90210 said:I appealed in my name by email but I didn't give them my address so not sure where they got that from.
The car is registered to my address but not with me as rk. Maybe they just made the assumption?
Is this something of significance in terms of a defence?2 -
I agree with Le_Kirk, a timeline is a good idea0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
