We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!

DCB legal for VCS. Witness statement due 9th April. Urgent help appreciated

24567

Comments

  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    D_P_Dance said:
     the point here being did DCBL add on a fake £70 AS  THEY NORMALLY DO and have they signed a statement of truth stating the fake add on is lawful ?

    Remind me, would that be contempt of court, or perjery?  
    For witness statements, the statement of truth’s wording will be as follows:
    I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

    This would surely mean that a witness statement with a signature stating that the unlawful of £60/£70 is lawful. Such a statement would go against what the courts are saying and then who was lying, the courts or the claimant
  • D_P_Dance
    D_P_Dance Posts: 11,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 5 April 2020 at 3:57PM
    CM,this is totally unacceptable in a Civil Court, it is highly uncivil.  If I had been there I would have complained to the Bar Council.  Did you?
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 25,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Le_Kirk said:
    If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name?  How did you receive court papers in your name? 
    I submitted an appeal using my details. So from there they are saying that is in effect admitting to being the driver
    Le_Kirk said:
    If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name?  How did you receive court papers in your name? 
    Reading the witness statement by Jake Burgess (there's a familiar name) he states that as the driver had not paid, they obtained the name and address of the registered keeper.  Something is not right somewhere.
    Registered keeper is a relative but not me nor have I ever been.?
    But who is named on the court papers?  In whose name did you (or anyone) submit the defence?  Who completed the AoS and in whose name?
  • Viera90210
    Viera90210 Posts: 24 Forumite
    10 Posts
    Le_Kirk said:
    Le_Kirk said:
    If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name?  How did you receive court papers in your name? 
    I submitted an appeal using my details. So from there they are saying that is in effect admitting to being the driver
    Le_Kirk said:
    If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name?  How did you receive court papers in your name? 
    Reading the witness statement by Jake Burgess (there's a familiar name) he states that as the driver had not paid, they obtained the name and address of the registered keeper.  Something is not right somewhere.
    Registered keeper is a relative but not me nor have I ever been.?
    But who is named on the court papers?  In whose name did you (or anyone) submit the defence?  Who completed the AoS and in whose name?
    All forms are in my name.
  • Viera90210
    Viera90210 Posts: 24 Forumite
    10 Posts
    beamerguy said:
    D_P_Dance said:
     the point here being did DCBL add on a fake £70 AS  THEY NORMALLY DO and have they signed a statement of truth stating the fake add on is lawful ?

    Remind me, would that be contempt of court, or perjery?  
    For witness statements, the statement of truth’s wording will be as follows:
    I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

    This would surely mean that a witness statement with a signature stating that the unlawful of £60/£70 is lawful. Such a statement would go against what the courts are saying and then who was lying, the courts or the claimant
    So should I open with this?
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    beamerguy said:
    D_P_Dance said:
     the point here being did DCBL add on a fake £70 AS  THEY NORMALLY DO and have they signed a statement of truth stating the fake add on is lawful ?

    Remind me, would that be contempt of court, or perjery?  
    For witness statements, the statement of truth’s wording will be as follows:
    I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

    This would surely mean that a witness statement with a signature stating that the unlawful of £60/£70 is lawful. Such a statement would go against what the courts are saying and then who was lying, the courts or the claimant
    So should I open with this?
    No,  the point is to make the judge aware of the fake add on and what other courts have said.
    If their signed statement of truth claims the fake £60 is a legitimate claim, that is time to refer the judge to the new Civil Procedure and let the judge take over
  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 25,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Le_Kirk said:
    Le_Kirk said:
    If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name?  How did you receive court papers in your name? 
    I submitted an appeal using my details. So from there they are saying that is in effect admitting to being the driver
    Le_Kirk said:
    If you are not the Registered Keeper, how did you receive a charge notice in your name?  How did you receive court papers in your name? 
    Reading the witness statement by Jake Burgess (there's a familiar name) he states that as the driver had not paid, they obtained the name and address of the registered keeper.  Something is not right somewhere.
    Registered keeper is a relative but not me nor have I ever been.?
    But who is named on the court papers?  In whose name did you (or anyone) submit the defence?  Who completed the AoS and in whose name?
    All forms are in my name.
    OK, now how did you get claim forms if you are not the RK nor the driver as per your OP?
  • Viera90210
    Viera90210 Posts: 24 Forumite
    10 Posts
    I appealed in my name by email but I didn't give them my address so not sure where they got that from.
    The car is registered to my address but not with me as rk. Maybe they just made the assumption?
    Is this something of significance in terms of a defence?
  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 25,663 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I appealed in my name by email but I didn't give them my address so not sure where they got that from.
    The car is registered to my address but not with me as rk. Maybe they just made the assumption?
    Is this something of significance in terms of a defence?
    To me it is a mess and it looks like the claimant is chasing the wrong person unless they are going after you as driver.  I would make sure I laid it out with a timeline in the Witness Statement showing clearly how you got to this point and submitting, as evidence, the documentation you have received and sent.
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I agree with Le_Kirk, a timeline is a good idea
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.8K Life & Family
  • 260K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.