We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Jsa boosted money?
preables
Posts: 76 Forumite
I am still on jsa as they never changed me to universal credit but my friends have told me due to covid 19 they get extra money on uc! Is it the same for jobseekers? If so do I have to call them?
0
Comments
-
No, those that claim the legacy benefits such as JSA/ESA will not receive the extra money. It's for those claiming UC/working tax credits only. For UC it's added to the standard allowance for 1 year.
1 -
While I agree the increase is just for UC, it should be noted income based JSA is a legacy benefit being replaced by UC. Contribution based JSA has been replaced by 'new style JSA', which will just be called JSA once income based JSA has been completely withdrawn - it will never become part of UC, which is an income based benefit. Those on 'new style JSA' have to undertake actions which people claiming UC also have to do but that those claiming old JSA don't.poppy12345 said:No, those that claim the legacy benefits such as JSA/ESA will not receive the extra money. It's for those claiming UC/working tax credits only. For UC it's added to the standard allowance for 1 year.0 -
im in the same boat, been ringing them last couple days but they just hangup. just a couple of non dwp articles stating theyre not giving £20 to jsa/esa.preables said:I am still on jsa as they never changed me to universal credit but my friends have told me due to covid 19 they get extra money on uc! Is it the same for jobseekers? If so do I have to call them?
disgusting theyre using a pandemic to bullying ppl onto UC, especially considering they cant cope with increased amount of applicants.0 -
The extra payment is meant to be be for people that work and they had a large drop in income. The fact that some people on Universal Credit that don't work had an increase is just there good luck. You don't need to change your claim to universal credit if you don't want to1
-
Completely agree, though unfortunately there is an unintended extra cost to the pandemic with no longer being able to buy groceries and other staple items either in bulk or multibuy offers, on which many people relied to get them through the month - so for those without the larger increase it will be harder. But then those who have been furloughed with a lower wage coming in and not on any increased benefits will be struggling too.Nannytone said:The extra payment is meant to be be for people that work and they had a large drop in income. The fact that some people on Universal Credit that don't work had an increase is just there good luck. You don't need to change your claim to universal credit if you don't want to0 -
Yeah because you cannot expect all those hard working taxpayers who now find themselves reliant on state support to survive on normal benefits like £73 JSA for the unemployed, £73 ESA for the disabled, or £66 carer's allowance. No, no they need up to £2,500 a month Job Furlough, or at least £93 a week Universal Credit, money is no object in support of them because they are the most in need, the most vulnerable, not say those on less money who are unable to work due to disability or being full time carers or losing their job before recent events, they are the undeserving poor.Nannytone said:The extra payment is meant to be be for people that work and they had a large drop in income. The fact that some people on Universal Credit that don't work had an increase is just there good luck.
2 -
I am disabled and unable to work and live on benefits.
But I am not used to having a decent income or a mortgage or debt that I could afford because I was earning enough money.
In the majority of these people are the ones that pay their tax that pays our benefit4 -
And throughout history before the Coronavirus no one who had a decent income, mortgage or debt ever became unemployed, unable to work due to disability or had to give up working to care for someone. So before this crisis there was no need for people to have job furloughs or an extra £20 a week of benefits. Because they all choose to be poor rather than suffered a massive drop in income due to circumstances beyond their control. And its not like they were ever taxpayers.Nannytone said:I am disabled and unable to work and live on benefits.
But I am not used to having a decent income or a mortgage or debt that I could afford because I was earning enough money.
In the majority of these people are the ones that pay their tax that pays our benefit
And it is not like people on £73 JSA or £73 ESA or £66 Carer's Allowance are struggling to survive. Why many go to food banks for the fun of it. And its not like the surge in suicides amongst benefit claimants in recent years has anything to do with poverty.
0 -
The only people that are guaranteed to lose money during the pandemic are those that are having to stop working during it. My money hasn't changed.
Are the people receiving more doesn't change my circumstances.
Maybe people should stop bleating let someone is getting more than then and realise but under current circumstances are lucky to be alive I've6 -
sparkycat2 I understand your frustration but that is a separate discussion. This particular *temporary* increase is for a specific purpose, and people who have not had a huge drop in income due to the pandemic aren't included in that purpose (those on UC who were already not working are an accidental side-effect - it would take an entire extra system to sort out who did and didn't qualify for the extra help and quite honestly the entire UC system cannot cope anyway, with all the new applications).
Btw, the furlough scheme is not '£2500 per month' - it's up to 80% of their normal wage but capped at £2500. Those people are all losing money too, but the idea is that they can then still hopefully survive.
What happens when this is all over, nobody knows - nobody knows where all this money is coming from. It is temporary, an emergency measure, and the aftermath will have to be sorted out later. But those of us already surviving on benefits already have cut costs, know how to live frugally, and haven't had to worry too much more overall, financially anyway - and our benefits aren't going to suddenly disappear at the end of this. For all those furloughed employees and supported self-employed people, there is no certainty that there will be enough business for things to resume as normal when we come out the other side.1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards