BW Legal / Premier Park Ltd - Court Claim

D_P_Dance

The Contractual Costs referred to above form part of the Terms and Conditions (of the parking contract) 

Thus rendering the contract unlawful

these costs are entirely reasonable 

No, they are unlawful.  Report this lying dirty shirt to the SRA, you might get them struck off.

https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/

beamerguy

The Contractual Costs referred to above form part of the Terms and Conditions (of the parking contract) which were accepted by you in the course of staying at the car park. Save for the fact that the sum of £60.00 attributable towards these costs are entirely reasonable for nature and type of work involved in recovering the parking charge, such costs are recoverable under the relevant parking code of practice.

And that is a copy and paste and the usual nonsensical rubbish  from BWLegal.

Go back and ask them on what legal authority does the PPC have to add so called contractual charges which is against POFA2012 and the Supreme court and county courts say it's unlawful and abuse of process

The next wheeze from BWLegal will be they are allowed to by the Code of Practice which again will be nonsensical rubbish as the code of practice operated by the BPA and IPC  is neither a law or a contract

This is going to be yet another case of BWLegal being spanked in court for abuse of process. Get your costs schedule ready 

Only 2 options for BWLegal, take this rubbish to court for a spanking or discontinue ........ 

PS, If and whenever this ever gets to court, get yourself a nice long cane to take with you as I'm sure the canes used to spank BWLegal by judges have been worn down. 

Umkomaas

The right to restrict processing only applies in certain limited circumstances. We are not of the view that the right to restrict processing is applicable in this case. 

They are correct because you asked for a restriction in processing for the wrong reason - to allow time for your SAR response.  You need to require a restriction in processing to 'take debt advice' (notwithstanding your denial that any debt exists) and they must now restrict processing in line with the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims (PaP). 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/pdf/protocols/debt-pap.pdf

Go back at them. 

Coupon-mad

You were not meant to send the SAR to BW Legal...

kevin_uk84

Hi @Coupon-mad, 
I sent the SAR to Premier Parking.   However, for good measure, I also included a request of BW Legal.
Kev

D_P_Dance

Well done, you appear to be learning the rules  of the game.

http://www.dorsetcricketboard.co.uk/page/womengirls/womens-hardball-cricket-2019/hardball-super-8-league-rules-15949/

beamerguy

kevin_uk84 said:

Hi @Coupon-mad, 
I sent the SAR to Premier Parking.   However, for good measure, I also included a request of BW Legal.
Kev

Don't expect any logical reply from BWLegal regarding the SAR.   BWL seem to miss all the tell tell signs that they will fail and go forth like a bull in a china shop to a spanking. 

Don't forget the phase two question

Go back and ask them on what legal authority does the PPC have to add so called contractual charges which is against POFA2012 and the Supreme court and county courts say it's unlawful and abuse of process

kevin_uk84

beamerguy said:

kevin_uk84 said:

Hi @Coupon-mad, 
I sent the SAR to Premier Parking.   However, for good measure, I also included a request of BW Legal.
Kev

Don't expect any logical reply from BWLegal regarding the SAR.   BWL seem to miss all the tell tell signs that they will fail and go forth like a bull in a china shop to a spanking. 

Don't forget the phase two question

Go back and ask them on what legal authority does the PPC have to add so called contractual charges which is against POFA2012 and the Supreme court and county courts say it's unlawful and abuse of process

Thanks beamerguy - I will go back to them today.  Do you have any links relating to the Supreme Court / County Court rulings that I can look over?

nosferatu1001

The template defence has three appendices to lok through, that contain all detail you need. 

beamerguy

kevin_uk84 said:

beamerguy said:

kevin_uk84 said:

Hi @Coupon-mad, 
I sent the SAR to Premier Parking.   However, for good measure, I also included a request of BW Legal.
Kev

Don't expect any logical reply from BWLegal regarding the SAR.   BWL seem to miss all the tell tell signs that they will fail and go forth like a bull in a china shop to a spanking. 

Don't forget the phase two question

Go back and ask them on what legal authority does the PPC have to add so called contractual charges which is against POFA2012 and the Supreme court and county courts say it's unlawful and abuse of process

Thanks beamerguy - I will go back to them today.  Do you have any links relating to the Supreme Court / County Court rulings that I can look over?

You don't need to look at the Beavis case, suffice to say the Supreme Court ruled ...

198. ''...The charge has to be and is set at a level which enables the managers to recover the costs of operating the scheme...''

So £100 ticket includes the cost of operation and that means simply ... no fake £60 add-on

When these crazzies refer to the Beavis case, they never tell you this