We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Regular Savings Accounts: The Best Currently Available List!
Options
Comments
-
I did likewise, e.g. if there was an account I wanted to open with a provider that accepted debit card payments, I would use NatWest to secure it. I would also pay the odd pence off the end of a bill (only), as odd numbers annoy me unless roundups are involved.
I had stopped funding/withdrawn from NatWest in favour of 7%+ accounts so am pretty much starting again as of this month.0 -
Bridlington1 said:Kim_13 said:Growingold said:Bridlington1 said:Kazza242 said:According to Moneyfacts, Principality Building Society are launching a new account called, 1 Year Triple Access Regular Saver, paying 6.00%.
Pay in £1 - £50 per month. The maximum investment is £600.
It permits 3 penalty-free withdrawals during the term of the account. The account matures after one year.
It will be available to open online and in branch.
The account should appear amongst the list of accounts on the Principality BS webpage once launched, here.
EDIT: Application link for 1Y Triple Access RS now live:
https://online.principality.co.uk/Originations/launchpage.aspx?productType=eSaver&productCode=9052#!1 -
Kim_13 said:
I had stopped funding/withdrawn from NatWest in favour of 7%+ accounts so am pretty much starting again as of this month.Not Rachmaninov
But Nyman
The heart asks for pleasure first
SPC 8 £1567.31 SPC 9 £1014.64 SPC 10 # £1164.13 SPC 11 £1598.15 SPC 12 # £994.67 SPC 13 £962.54 SPC 14 £1154.79 SPC15 £715.38 SPC16 £1071.81⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Declutter thread - ⭐⭐🏅0 -
Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.
0 -
Bigwheels1111 said:Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.0
-
Bigwheels1111 said:Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.
You'll see this info at end of application, in online account & in email1 -
Bigwheels1111 said:Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.
A pain if your bank don't have a description field, as you need the reference to be the account number as you say.1 -
savethepandas said:Bigwheels1111 said:Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.Many thanks,Now I just need to set up standing order for the first.0
-
Bigwheels1111 said:Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.
I selected personal account, and used my usual naming convention for the account name. I knew this couldn't match, and I simply accepted the mismatch.
My usual naming convention is LCbankxxxx, where bank is Princ for Principality, and xxxx the last four digits of the Reference or the Account Number where I have a personal account number. That way I can easily identify which of my several Principality accounts the payment is for.
1 -
friolento said:Bigwheels1111 said:Having a brain fart here and now.For the Principality, what name do I use, mine or Principality.I know my acc no is the ref.
I selected personal account, and used my usual naming convention for the account name. I knew this couldn't match, and I simply accepted the mismatch.My approach is similar. Always set them up as Business and use a meaningful description, otherwise (as is my case) I'd end up with four "Principality Building Society"s and needing to use the Ref as the determinant. That's bound to lead to mistakes.I thought I read somewhere that the eventual intention was to strictly apply account verification so you couldn't pay to an account where there was a mismatch, meaning our aproach would no longer work. Hopefully that's either not true or a long way off.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards