We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Regular Savings Accounts: The Best Currently Available List!
Options
Comments
-
Stargunner said:happybagger said:zagfles said:snow62 said:By my calculations, that extra £200 at 8% will at most earn £1.27 - if it's in for 30 days before the account matures. i.e. about 4p per day.No, if you time it right the extra £200 is in for almost a year, not a month.0
-
friolento said:happybagger said:zagfles said:snow62 said:By my calculations, that extra £200 at 8% will at most earn £1.27 - if it's in for 30 days before the account matures. i.e. about 4p per day.No, if you time it right the extra £200 is in for almost a year, not a month.
I would say it is the first. As zagflies explains, instead of only £200, you start out with near enough £400. If you time it right, that is.
Anyways, given the tiny amount of interest concerned (in either scenario), that's me done on the subject.0 -
subjecttocontract said:How much extra interest does making a 13th payment provide ?0
-
This thread is constantly being diverted on to tangents with no real connection to breaking news.
I imagine it will continue like this now that new RSs are unlikely thanks to the BoE decision.1 -
I suspect some people are looking at it the wrong way. The '13th' payment is irrelevant. What is relevant is that if you used the workaround, you're effectively pulling forward the remaining payments after the first one, by almost a month. The overall 'effect' of that is similar to having a bonus payment at the beginning.
The question for me would be is that risking the potential wrath of Nationwide. Almost certainly not, but the modest upside isn't worth the risk, even if it's a well worn tactic.0 -
schiff said:This thread is constantly being diverted on to tangents with no real connection to breaking news.
I imagine it will continue like this now that new RSs are unlikely thanks to the BoE decision.2 -
Applied for the Monmouthshire reg savers the day they came out but went on holiday 2 days later for 2.5 weeks. The day before the reg savers came online I applied for their normal saver, just in case. When I got home I had received one passbook for the 8% account and two other letters telling me the account numbers of the 7% reg saver and the easy saver together with a form to sign. Posted both on the 14th of Sep and applied the same day online for internet access. Until now I have not heard anything back. I have also not funded any account as I only do that when I have also access to the funds.
Same procedure for OH, except no passbook at all and no sight of the 8% reg saver. Only difference is that letters to sign were posted on the 18th
Is there any hope that we will be be able to use the accounts as we would ideally want to make a September contribution and have normal access or is it better to forget about it and never touch that building society ever again? Rather frustrated by now about their unprofessionalism and how ridiculously slow everything is. Not sure if I can trust them with my cash.
Should I call and complain?0 -
pecunianonolet said:Applied for the Monmouthshire reg savers the day they came out but went on holiday 2 days later for 2.5 weeks. The day before the reg savers came online I applied for their normal saver, just in case. When I got home I had received one passbook for the 8% account and two other letters telling me the account numbers of the 7% reg saver and the easy saver together with a form to sign. Posted both on the 14th of Sep and applied the same day online for internet access. Until now I have not heard anything back. I have also not funded any account as I only do that when I have also access to the funds.
Same procedure for OH, except no passbook at all and no sight of the 8% reg saver. Only difference is that letters to sign were posted on the 18th
Is there any hope that we will be be able to use the accounts as we would ideally want to make a September contribution and have normal access or is it better to forget about it and never touch that building society ever again? Rather frustrated by now about their unprofessionalism and how ridiculously slow everything is. Not sure if I can trust them with my cash.
Should I call and complain?2 -
Catplan said:pecunianonolet said:Applied for the Monmouthshire reg savers the day they came out but went on holiday 2 days later for 2.5 weeks. The day before the reg savers came online I applied for their normal saver, just in case. When I got home I had received one passbook for the 8% account and two other letters telling me the account numbers of the 7% reg saver and the easy saver together with a form to sign. Posted both on the 14th of Sep and applied the same day online for internet access. Until now I have not heard anything back. I have also not funded any account as I only do that when I have also access to the funds.
Same procedure for OH, except no passbook at all and no sight of the 8% reg saver. Only difference is that letters to sign were posted on the 18th
Is there any hope that we will be be able to use the accounts as we would ideally want to make a September contribution and have normal access or is it better to forget about it and never touch that building society ever again? Rather frustrated by now about their unprofessionalism and how ridiculously slow everything is. Not sure if I can trust them with my cash.
Should I call and complain?
Once I have access to my accounts I fund them. I am not sending money somewhere, when I can't access the account.0 -
Altior said:I suspect some people are looking at it the wrong way. The '13th' payment is irrelevant. What is relevant is that if you used the workaround, you're effectively pulling forward the remaining payments after the first one, by almost a month. The overall 'effect' of that is similar to having a bonus payment at the beginning.
The question for me would be is that risking the potential wrath of Nationwide. Almost certainly not, but the modest upside isn't worth the risk, even if it's a well worn tactic.Seriously? It's using the account the way it's designed to be used! NW have always done RS accounts like this, inc their "start to save" accounts. They are fully aware that nearly everyone will have 13 calendar months to increase their balance and that the second payment could be the day after the first if opened at the end of the month.If they didn't like people doing this they'd have similar T&Cs to Santander where a "month" starts on the date the account is opened.There are some uber MSE ways of expoliting bank offers, such as using the NatWest "round up" facility to make hundreds of £1.01 debit card payments, that could well incur "wrath". But paying in £200 every calendar month to an account that allows £200 every calendar month? Nah...9
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards