We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New "Have a Look at This" thread
Comments
-
Think the ones that don't have a kitchen labelled have a kitchen facility in the living room. I took the scully to be the same as scullery. I don't know about Glasgow but from where I'm from tenements were associated with very poor residents and they definitely wouldn't have serviced flats.TBagpuss said:
Fascinating. It looks like originally not all of them had kitchens, and those that did had beds in the kitchen?GaleSF63 said:
Or the other way round. Some old tenement flats had only one or two rooms.rigolith said:Wonder what happened. One home split into two or three?
Plans for tenements in 1906.
4353385122_5bdf58e76a_b.jpg (1024×835) (flickr.com)
I know some flats of that period and a bit later didn't have kitchens are they were serviced flats with residents ordering meals from a restaurant on the ground floor, so I wondered initially if it had been like that, and perhaps divided. I assume that that kind of services flats were aimed at a better-off owner or tenant, though.0 -
Ha! Nothing as posh as that. If there was only one room, that was where everything happened, including cooking.TBagpuss said:
Fascinating. It looks like originally not all of them had kitchens, and those that did had beds in the kitchen?GaleSF63 said:
Or the other way round. Some old tenement flats had only one or two rooms.rigolith said:Wonder what happened. One home split into two or three?
Plans for tenements in 1906.
4353385122_5bdf58e76a_b.jpg (1024×835) (flickr.com)
I know some flats of that period and a bit later didn't have kitchens are they were serviced flats with residents ordering meals from a restaurant on the ground floor, so I wondered initially if it had been like that, and perhaps divided. I assume that that kind of services flats were aimed at a better-off owner or tenant, though.2 -
No these were very much for the poor end of the population. Shared loos out in the back yard. Beds were in recesses a bit like big cupboards. The one room flat was known as a single-end and the two rooms as room and kitchen. Even up to the 1950s the single-end could be occupied by 2 or more adults and their children.TBagpuss said:
Fascinating. It looks like originally not all of them had kitchens, and those that did had beds in the kitchen?GaleSF63 said:
Or the other way round. Some old tenement flats had only one or two rooms.rigolith said:Wonder what happened. One home split into two or three?
Plans for tenements in 1906.
4353385122_5bdf58e76a_b.jpg (1024×835) (flickr.com)
I know some flats of that period and a bit later didn't have kitchens are they were serviced flats with residents ordering meals from a restaurant on the ground floor, so I wondered initially if it had been like that, and perhaps divided. I assume that that kind of services flats were aimed at a better-off owner or tenant, though.0 -
Some very bold colour scheme choices in this house! I guess it makes a change from grey!
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/113064458#/?channel=RES_BUY
It also seems to have been sold twice in 2020 but no photos to see previous condition, big price difference in 2021 from 2020!2 -
Its had a fair bit of work on it, a shame in some instances https://www.zoopla.co.uk/property/84-bradford-road/guiseley/leeds/ls20-8ht/13679260/Noseybear38 said:Some very bold colour scheme choices in this house! I guess it makes a change from grey!
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/113064458#/?channel=RES_BUY
It also seems to have been sold twice in 2020 but no photos to see previous condition, big price difference in 2021 from 2020!
Looking at streetview there was a lot of overgrown ivy on the roof too. It seems very clinical now.
2 -
The quality of some of those photos is awful. Looks like rendering instead of a photos of an actual house.Noseybear38 said:Some very bold colour scheme choices in this house! I guess it makes a change from grey!
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/113064458#/?channel=RES_BUY
It also seems to have been sold twice in 2020 but no photos to see previous condition, big price difference in 2021 from 2020!1 -
Wow that’s a lot of bedrooms, this flat could solve London’s housing crisis
9 -
Here's more info on this unique form of housing.GaleSF63 said:
Or the other way round. Some old tenement flats had only one or two rooms.[Deleted User] said:Wonder what happened. One home split into two or three?
Plans for tenements in 1906.
4353385122_5bdf58e76a_b.jpg (1024×835) (flickr.com)The bed recesses in kitchens were typically used ( in the past) when guests came and were given the main bedroom. My late DM had hers shelved out for storage whilst others in the close squared of the rooms.Here's a tenement property which is a complete contrast to the one I posted earlier. https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/112859885#/?channel=RES_BUY And it's not at the top end of fabulousness.1 -
As Dolly Parton said: 'it takes a lot of money to look this cheap'. That place is just crap, to put no finer point on it. It was much nicer prior to the recent vandalism, mostly because of the decent fittings then in place. I think it might be the increasing homogeneity of interior design; everything is made in the same style and drab colour palette, regardless of the quality of the materials. Companies churn out cheap copies of expensive things, others take cheap fittings and gold plate them. Everything looks like everything else, so that place looks no different to the more sensibly priced house up the road.Noseybear38 said:Some very bold colour scheme choices in this house! I guess it makes a change from grey!
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/113064458#/?channel=RES_BUY
It also seems to have been sold twice in 2020 but no photos to see previous condition, big price difference in 2021 from 2020!7 -
I agree. This one’s so soulless the one person in the bedroom looks forlorn8
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


