We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
Car registered in my name forge!
Comments
-
That obligation only arises in response to a s.172 request, which at that point the sister has not received. It's possible the police might now issue one, but as the original offence will probably have timed out it seems unlikely.Assuming that last is true. There is an obligation to give any information you have that may identify the driver. So if either of you actually know or strongly suspect that a particular family member has committed the offence you do have to dob them in.0 -
It's not clear from the OPs timeline. It seems as if the OP suspects a particular individual of the fraudulent registration and it may well be asked of the sister if they have any relevant knowledge. I'm suggesting it would be a good idea to offer this information to police or court rather than be suspected of collusion.I need to think of something new here...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards