Should I take this to the agency or forget it?

189 Posts

I had an intercontinental BA flight cancelled for a strike (you may be aware of it, as it happened last September) and BA refused to pay any compensation because they say they warned everyone 14 days before the accident.
This was not my case though, as while BA may have warned my agency (Travel Up), Travel Up warned me only two days before the departure.
They have been super good to find an alternative without make me spend any extra money, but I am not sure if I should claim anyway for a compensation due to the disruption (after all I had to take a connection flight instead of the initial direct one), or forget it. Thoughts?
This was not my case though, as while BA may have warned my agency (Travel Up), Travel Up warned me only two days before the departure.
They have been super good to find an alternative without make me spend any extra money, but I am not sure if I should claim anyway for a compensation due to the disruption (after all I had to take a connection flight instead of the initial direct one), or forget it. Thoughts?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
I think they did a good job, but here I am asking if there are grounds for a case.
An agent is not liable for EU261 compensation (only airlines) you would be asking for some sort of goodwill gesture based on them not passing the cancellation information to you in a timely manner
If you go with an agent make sure it's a reputable agent. Tripadvisor is littered with complaints about Travel Up dire customer service.
https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/SearchForums?q=travelup&scope=1&sub-search=Search&ff=10702&geo=1&returnTo=__2F__ShowForum__2D__g1__2D__i10702__2D__Air__5F__Travel__2E__html
Cut out the middleman and book direct with the airline.