New battle

Allygood100

The car was register to the defendant brother at a certain point in the distant past and they share tge same family name but still weird to mail to another address with the right name.

Allygood100

twhitehousescat said:

whats getting me , did the dvla get it wrong or did the parking Co guess the owners name/address , in which case they are in big trouble 

DVLA are above angles they follow the rules and guidelines. Apparently

twhitehousescat

ahh , is it possible that the VRN was on the parking Cos computer from a earlier occassion , and instead of paying the DVLA they used this info 

have you asked the dvla if , when and who asked for info wlilst the car was reg to you 

Half_way

twhitehousescat said:

ahh , is it possible that the VRN was on the parking Cos computer from a earlier occassion , and instead of paying the DVLA they used this info 

have you asked the dvla if , when and who asked for info wlilst the car was reg to you 

if they are using old data, then the parking company and who ever employed them could be in a spot of bother, for that reason you must ask the DVLA when the data was requested
 Also, who's car park was this?

Umkomaas

You should email the DVLA and ask which organisations (when and for what reason) accessed the registered keeper's data from them between a range of dates which includes the date(s) of the parking incident(s). You need to provide the registered keeper's full name and address, the address on the V5C logbook and the Vehicle Registration Mark of the vehicle involved in the parking incident. 

SubjectAccess.Requests@dvla.gov.uk

This service is free of charge. 

Even though you email your request, the DVLA will respond via Royal Mail.

Allygood100

Guys im abit confused with this telephone hearing thing as to whom is responsible in setting the 3 way call. Haven't heard from claimant since the letten from the court informing us of the phone hearing thing!

Le_Kirk

The court will arrange it, all you have to do is follow the judgment/order, make sure you have supplied your "bundle" to the claimant, that the claimant is sending this to the court and you have provided the court (e-mail address as per the judgment/order) with your telephone number and that of any witness/lay rep.

Ralph-y

this thread may well help

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6130456/telephone-hearings-re-parking-firm-claims-can-we-all-discuss-strategy-and-outcomes-here/p1

Ralph

nosferatu1001

Allygood100 said:

Hello everyone I hope you all are well.
Just recieved mail today from court about a telephone hearing for this case. Not to confidant about the phone hearing because i think it will give an advantage to the claimant and to be honest was hopping that the claimant rep won't turn up to court if it was a physical hearing .
What you guys think and whats the best way to object to a phone hearing.
Your advice is much appreciated. 

You havent shown us the letter, that Ive seen, so may be consider doing that. 
Its usually relaly expllcit as to who has to set up the call and do what
But just in case, show us. 

Coupon-mad

In some local courts to me, the courts have been making the Claimant arrange the call.

If you hear nothing, you just wait till the day before then email your phone number to the court and say how disappointed you are that the Claimant has failed to comply with the Order for them to arrange a telephone conference call and in desperation, you are providing your number to the court and Claimant (copy in the solicitors for the PPC). 

Re-attach your costs assessment and ask for your wasted day off work and your hours of time at £19 per hour in reading the papers, reseaching, printing and producing a robust court bundle, and you ask that these costs be granted in full. In the recent case of Dammerman v Lanyon Bowdler LLP [2017] EXCA Civ 269 (12 April 2017) the Court of Appeal considered the meaning of "unreasonable behaviour" in relation to costs in the small claims track appeal and you invite the court to apply the same established principles in the event that the C discontinues at the eleventh hour and/or the claim is struck out and the hearing vacated.

That will either make the robo-claim solicitor jump or fall over.  Either will do!