County Court Judgement Received

Blue1133

Ok, have been back to the 'scene of the crime'. Although some signs have since been added, clearly in my opinion are inadequate. All signs there relate to visitors requiring a permit, nothing in relation to residents requiring a permit to park. There are no signs upon entering the area that this matter relates to.

With regards to the lease, or tenancy, the estate agents sold up and moved away, and so has the previous owner of the property. Getting the tenancy agreement is just not going to be possible though I'm sure I can make some enquiries to show I have at least tried.

Do I need the tenancy or lease agreement in order to rely upon that argument?

Blue1133

Ok, I have found some information after trawling some old files, Is anybody able to view these documents in order to assist?

Blue1133

Ok, I have found some information after trawling some old files, Is anybody able to view these documents in order to assist?

DoaM

Redact personal details and then upload them to Dropbox or Google Docs and then post a broken link* in a reply here. (You don't have enough post count to post proper links).

* drop the http and / and www bits ... maybe also insert a space before .co.uk or .com

Blue1133

drive. google. com/open?id=1bLyKI4gvi39MvuyGEcW24jz6Le71ipB3

Blue1133

Particulars of claim: THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE WITH REGISTRATION xxxxxx (THE 'VEHICLE') PARKED IN BREACH OF THE TERMS OF PARKING STIPULATED ON THE SIGNAGE (THE 'CONTRACT') AT xxxxxxxxxx (name of estate and development) - PERMITS
ONLY - TCHA - xxxx xxxxx ROAD 1234 xxxxx ROAD xxxx xxxxx ROAD XXXXX XXXX STREET, ON XX/XX/XX THUS INCURRING THE PARKING CHARGE (THE 'PCN'). THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE AGREED TO PAY THE PCN WITHIN 28 DAYS OF ISSUE YET FAILED TO DO SO. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE UNPAID PCN FROM THE DEFENDANT AS THE DRIVER/KEEPER OF THE VEHICLE.

DESPITE DEMANDS BEING MADE, THE DEFENDANT HAS FAILED TO SETTLE THEIR OUTSTANDING LIABILITY. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £xx FOR THE PCN, £xx.xx CONTRACTUAL COSTS PURSUANT TO THE CONTRACT AND PCN TERMS AND CONDITIONS, TOGETHER WITH STATUTORY INTEREST OF £xx.xx PURSUANT TO S69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT 8.00% PER ANNUM, CONTINUING AT £x.xx PER DAY

Judgement type: Judgement by Default

Le_Kirk

Your link made live: -
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bLyKI4gvi39MvuyGEcW24jz6Le71ipB3

Blue1133

Good evening, sorry for the bump. Wondering if there are any thoughts on the info posted. Regards.

Coupon-mad

Blue1133 wrote: »

Further to this - please also note that a 'letter of claim' was sent to the address, the letter is dated a few days after the judgement but before 28 days was entered, the headed letter has no name, just address, and amount owed £0, no registration or anything to identify who it is in relation to/what it is in relation to - will this change anything - is this abuse of process as clearly the address was known?

What do you mean, that the Claimant issued a CLAIM to the old address, then 3 weeks later sent a LBC to the new address demanding £0, confusing the status of the case and proving that they had the new address all along?

Why have you put a border round the tenancy wording that says cars won't be ticketed if in front of their own garage or on a certain side of the approach road? Are you saying there is no evidence as to where the car actually was?

Blue1133

Exactly, thanks for your message! Any mileage in the signage? I'll be doing .pre reading on it today to look at dimensions etc