We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Deeply troubled (╯-╰)
Comments
-
Sorry, my word is wrong.Not to me.
I will reiterate:
It may be the OP's style of wording.
But I don't know that.
And neither do you.
I would not like to think anyone thinks it appropriate to 'chase' or 'pursue' anyone simply because they don't reply to texts.
And I'm not the only poster to think that:
Do you?You can tell a lot about somebody,looking him in the eyes.0 -
Not to me.
I will reiterate:
I would not like to think anyone thinks it appropriate to 'chase' or 'pursue' anyone simply because they don't reply to texts.
And I'm not the only poster to think that:
Do you?
You are trying to find some drama where there isnt any ... certainly not based on what the OP has written. He has sent a couple of texts without response which he acknowledges in post 13 to take a step back ... to insinuate he is some kind of predator is well over the top .... so you can all put your pitch forks away!BrassicWoman wrote: »If you've ever fallen victim to a creeper who just doesn't understand "no", then I think you would not make that assumption.
Reads sinister to me. Who badgers coworkers with texts at home?
A couple of texts in the evening is not "badgering" .... even in this over sensitive world!0 -
I am not 'trying to find' anything. Not even 'drama'.You are trying to find some drama where there isnt any ... certainly not based on what the OP has written. He has sent a couple of texts without response which he acknowledges in post 13 to take a step back ... to insinuate he is some kind of predator is well over the top .... so you can all put your pitch forks away!
I have read the words the OP has written and formed an opinion.
My opinion differs to yours.
I really don't care if you think my response is over the top.
I do not have a pitchfork.
This response ^^^^ clearly shows you have no concept of what Brassicwoman is talking about.A couple of texts in the evening is not "badgering" .... even in this over sensitive world!
But just because you haven't, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.0 -
!!!!!!! ... Someone needs to stop this witchunt!. You are doing to him exactly what you are claiming he has done to someone else. Worse in fact as you do know better. You are hounding him. He has nothing else he needs to explain to you. It is clear that the written word is not his strong point. The hypocrisy of your actions in this thread is beyond belief!
'hypocrisy'?
No hypocrisy here (are you sure you've used the correct word?)
No witchunt.
No hounding.
The OP described a situation and asked for opinions.
I am doing nothing other than giving my opinion.
I am not the only poster to express the same opinion.
If - as you say - the written word is not the OP's strong point, is it not possible that the person the OP says he wishes to 'chase' or 'pursue' has formed the same opinion as I have done?
Who do you think deserves more consideration?
The OP?
Or the person who he is contacting?0 -
'hypocrisy'?
No hypocrisy here (are you sure you've used the correct word?)
No witchunt.
No hounding.
The OP described a situation and asked for opinions.
I am doing nothing other than giving my opinion.
I am not the only poster to express the same opinion.
If - as you say - the written word is not the OP's strong point, is it not possible that the person the OP says he wishes to 'chase' or 'persue' has formed the same opinion as I have done?
Who do you think deserves more consideration?
The OP?
Or the person who he is contacting?
You made your point (badly imo) , and with regards the original poster by keep reiterating it doesn't make it acceptable behaviour and does make you a hypocrite or would you prefer "bully" as a better word? (I'm easy with either). Deflection doesn't hide it either.0 -
You may use whichever word you wish.You made your point (badly imo) , and with regards the original poster by keep reiterating it doesn't make it acceptable behaviour and does make you a hypocrite or would you prefer "bully" as a better word? (I'm easy with either). Deflection doesn't hide it either.
I'm sure we both hope that the OP has got the message about sending messages to this work colleague that are not reciprocated.0 -
-
uh..i know.thankseuronorris wrote: »SHE IS NOT INTERESTED IN YOU.
Drop it. Stop messaging her. Leave her alone. TAKE THE HINT!You can tell a lot about somebody,looking him in the eyes.0 -
I hope everyone will not argue again, thanks.
Excuse me: How to delete the post?You can tell a lot about somebody,looking him in the eyes.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards