We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New tenancy agreement states you must pay tv license whether you own a tv or not?

Is that enforceable? I hate tv and own no such devices so why should I have to pay for it whether I own a tv or not?
«13

Comments

  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    No it's not enforceable.
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Nothing to add to the above really, but if they ask to see it, say it's on-line as there's now no need for a paper copy.
  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 4,062 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    True, but if the clause is in there and at a later date they are trying to evict you for whatever reason - then you are essentially in breach of contract.

    You can argue that the terms of the contract are unfair - but if you've signed them - you've signed them.

    Best to get rid now, or get it re-worded to add in the words "If Applicable"

    Is it a single residence of are there some shared facilities?
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You can argue that the terms of the contract are unfair - but if you've signed them - you've signed them.


    I would think that such a clause is void under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations, so it doesn't matter if it's signed or not.


    I also think that it's exceptionally unlikely that a judge is going to order a Section 8 eviction for not buying a TV license.


    And if it's Section 21 at the end of the tenancy... well, they never need a justification for that, so they could do it anyway.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Dave46049 wrote: »
    True, but if the clause is in there and at a later date they are trying to evict you for whatever reason - then you are essentially in breach of contract. - And?

    You can argue that the terms of the contract are unfair - but if you've signed them - you've signed them. - And?

    Best to get rid now, or get it re-worded to add in the words "If Applicable"

    Is it a single residence of are there some shared facilities?



    I will happily pay £10 to a chosen charity if you can find a case where a court used it's discretionary eviction powers in such circumstances.
  • bsms1147
    bsms1147 Posts: 2,277 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Depending on how it’s worded...

    Pay for a friend’s one at another property (and get refunded by that friend). You’re paying for a TV licence and are not in breach of contract!

    Perfect compliance.
  • in S 38 T 2 F 50
    out S 36 T 9 F 24 FF 4

    2017-32 2018 -33 2019 -21 2020 -5 2021 -4 2022
  • user225688
    user225688 Posts: 146 Forumite
    100 Posts First Anniversary
    edited 30 October 2019 at 10:45AM
    The link from the tv licencing website regarding rental


    How does that pertains to the OP?

    I know what the general tv licensing rules are, I couldn't see how your link relates to the issue at hand.

    I am thinking to just let sleeping dogs lie and sign since the majority seem to say it is not enforceable?

    I have just found another thread (not allowed to post links) which seems to echo the same sentiments of it being unenforceable and would classify as unfair terms.

    The agreement has been done by the agents and is their usual template I am sure but it is the landlord who I will be dealing with if any matters arise and so far he has seemed a very reasonable chap. It is a property management company who will be on site and they are only outsourcing the marketing/tenancy stuff to the agents and I will hopefully not have to hear from the agents after this and we will be dealing directly with the property management/LL with any issues should they arise.

    So my point is I doubt the property team put this in so I doubt it will be of any consequence to them. So should I just go ahead and sign rather than muddy the waters with trying to figure out if/how I could take it out?

    I mean if it said 'the landlord can come in your premises any time he wants and use any appliance and just chill as he pleases' or 'the whole deposit will be kept by the LL as standard on moving out' then I would surely want to question that but for such a stipulation as tv license which people say is not enforceable should I just go ahead and sign since the majority are saying it is pretty much meaningless anyway and it isn't like they will be checking every week whether I have bought one.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    user225688 wrote: »
    How does that pertains to the OP?

    I know what the general tv licensing rules are, I couldn't see how your link relates to the issue at hand.

    I am thinking to just let sleeping dogs lie and sign since the majority seem to say it is not enforceable?

    I have just found another thread (not allowed to post links) which seems to echo the same sentiments of it being unenforceable and would classify as unfair terms.

    The agreement has been done by the agents and is their usual template I am sure but it is the landlord who I will be dealing with if any matters arise and so far he has seemed a very reasonable chap. It is a property management company who will be on site and they are only outsourcing the marketing/tenancy stuff to the agents and I will hopefully not have to hear from the agents after this and we will be dealing directly with the property management/LL with any issues should they arise.

    So my point is I doubt the property team put this in so I doubt it will be of any consequence to them. So should I just go ahead and sign rather than muddy the waters with trying to figure out if/how I could take it out?

    I mean if it said 'the landlord can come in your premises any time he wants and use any appliance and just chill as he pleases' or 'the whole deposit will be kept by the LL as standard on moving out' then I would surely want to question that but for such a stipulation as tv license which people say is not enforceable should I just go ahead and sign since the majority are saying it is pretty much meaningless anyway and it isn't like they will be checking every week whether I have bought one.



    Both of those clauses would be equally unenforceable.


    the first on the common law right to quiet enjoyment.


    The latter would be a fee, rather than deposit, and banned under the tenancy fees act


    The clause regarding TV licence in unenforceable because there is no loss to the landlord whether you get one or not
  • Comms69 wrote: »
    Both of those clauses would be equally unenforceable.


    the first on the common law right to quiet enjoyment.


    The latter would be a fee, rather than deposit, and banned under the tenancy fees act


    The clause regarding TV licence in unenforceable because there is no loss to the landlord whether you get one or not


    So should I go ahead and sign and don't mention it?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.