Excel / myparkingcharge Final Demand

Redx

You can submit beforehand , but not ambush them

You would do so to cast doubt on the previous signage that you put them to strict proof of the signs at the time of the incident

Coupon-mad

 Change ''the Defendant'' to ''I'' throughout a WS because this is your story in your words. 

You should add that you have been back and more signs have been added (append evidence of how bad the signs were).  State that the fact it has been changed suggests that the Claimant knew their earlier lack of signs was an issue and no doubt caused complaints to the landowner.

What evidence are you submitting with this WS?

And if there was purportedly a red card on the windscreen (they say there was...OK, you didn't find one but hey, let them say that!) then you should state that this is a DVLA banned practice and breaches the POFA.  It impersonates a parking charge then denies it is a parking charge - wholly unfair - and allows a parking firm to obtain DVLA data too early.  See the thread by @adambuzz14 and his actual transcript that I am sure was linked on his thread but which I also linked for someone only last week, to use as an exhibit to explain to a Judge why a card on a windscreen is unfair and misleading and that getting DVLA data early (when a windscreen PCN should have been placed) is a banned practice.

1505grandad

Typo  -  "12. The Judge at Sailsbury ................"

myparkingchargevictim

Coupon-mad said:

 Change ''the Defendant'' to ''I'' throughout a WS because this is your story in your words. 

You should add that you have been back and more signs have been added (append evidence of how bad the signs were).  State that the fact it has been changed suggests that the Claimant knew their earlier lack of signs was an issue and no doubt caused complaints to the landowner.

What evidence are you submitting with this WS?

And if there was purportedly a red card on the windscreen (they say there was...OK, you didn't find one but hey, let them say that!) then you should state that this is a DVLA banned practice and breaches the POFA.  It impersonates a parking charge then denies it is a parking charge - wholly unfair - and allows a parking firm to obtain DVLA data too early.  See the thread by @adambuzz14 and his actual transcript that I am sure was linked on his thread but which I also linked for someone only last week, to use as an exhibit to explain to a Judge why a card on a windscreen is unfair and misleading and that getting DVLA data early (when a windscreen PCN should have been placed) is a banned practice.

Unfortunately I don't have any evidence to show how bad the signage was. Being an underground car park, I can't get any images from Google Maps either. It'd be my word against theirs essentially.

I'll add your point about the card. Thanks!

And evidence to package with, I don't have a whole lot I'm afraid. I've taken pictures of how the car park looks now but that doesn't help my case! If anything, it does the opposite.

myparkingchargevictim

Coupon-mad said:

 Change ''the Defendant'' to ''I'' throughout a WS because this is your story in your words. 

You should add that you have been back and more signs have been added (append evidence of how bad the signs were).  State that the fact it has been changed suggests that the Claimant knew their earlier lack of signs was an issue and no doubt caused complaints to the landowner.

What evidence are you submitting with this WS?

And if there was purportedly a red card on the windscreen (they say there was...OK, you didn't find one but hey, let them say that!) then you should state that this is a DVLA banned practice and breaches the POFA.  It impersonates a parking charge then denies it is a parking charge - wholly unfair - and allows a parking firm to obtain DVLA data too early.  See the thread by @adambuzz14 and his actual transcript that I am sure was linked on his thread but which I also linked for someone only last week, to use as an exhibit to explain to a Judge why a card on a windscreen is unfair and misleading and that getting DVLA data early (when a windscreen PCN should have been placed) is a banned practice.

Is there a link to a PDF version of this so I can include this as an exhibit?
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5906037/urgent-fighting-county-court-claim-for-pcn/p10

Or am I ok to copy paste this into a Word Doc and PDF it?

Coupon-mad

Yes I posted it on a thread last month.  A link to the court transcript itself.

Please just search the forum for @adambuzz14 and find the last time I mentioned it and it's there.

myparkingchargevictim

Coupon-mad said:

Yes I posted it on a thread last month.  A link to the court transcript itself.

Please just search the forum for @adambuzz14 and find the last time I mentioned it and it's there.

I only find this post about you asking for an actual link : https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76458716/#Comment_76458716

And other references from yourself referring to the @adambuzz14 thread :?

EDIT: Did more looking and found it. Here's the link for anyone else searching for it: https://www.dropbox.com/s/peh3uwf1wnrwq5g/APPROVED -E1QZ7X7C-VCS-BURZYNSKI.pdf?dl=0

myparkingchargevictim

Just to confirm, to submit my WS and Exhibits, I'm to do this by sending an email to my local county court? With everything as an individual attachment?

This case is to be heard at Birmingham CC, and they're using the BT MeetMe Application. I'll send my details regarding this.

Do I need to send anything else other than WS and Exhibits? Is it worth also attaching the previously sent defence?

Edit: I've seen a few threads which have a "Supplementary WS", which seems to all be identical about the Abuse of Process. Although my WS already covers this, should I also include this templated WS? (As this one: https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZzyXekZpNBjQJ48Dh7hJwCEP6NWkbJLhm4k)

nosferatu1001

You send to the court AND to the claimant, because the instructions tells you to do so. 
You do not send the defence again *unless* the telephone hearing letter you have tells you to compile a complete bundle to send to the court. 

myparkingchargevictim

To Confirm:
Attachments: 

Supplementary WS is as the link above.
Witness Statement has not differed too much from the previous page. Typo corrected and the point from @Coupon-mad added in.
I'm sending with no pictures or videos as I do not have any to substantiate this claim.

I'm going to email these to Birmingham CC. Should I also send a copy to excel litigation dept? 
And anything else I should mention in the body of my email? The covering letter from @Coupon-mad on the telephone thread doesn't apply to me I think, as the judge in this case has already called for a telephone hearing.