We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bookings.com Question

124»

Comments

  • eDicky
    eDicky Posts: 6,835 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    stephb34 wrote: »
    Did you really pop by and have a look, if so thats fabulous, well done, above and beyond a posters duty. Or am i that person thats gullible and your having a laugh (i do apologise if your serious)
    Well, it was an interesting diversion on a rainy Wednesday in Amsterdam, and not far out of my way. None of my posts are ever fictitious but suspicion that sometimes they might be is quite forgivable.

    I should add to my observations that these hotels obviously have no shortage of customers (unless I was told that all the cheaper rooms were taken because I looked like someone who would never entertain staying in one if I saw it in advance), and I think that there is zero chance of any kind of 'goodwill' cancellation refund from this hotel.

    Perhaps we'll hear from Jim about any comments received from the hotel as requested, or other outcome...
    Evolution, not revolution
  • And reading more carefully it appears that Leylandsunaddict is correct. Booking.com do a pretty good job of ensuring that they are not liable for anything in their T & Cs.
    The fact that this is not at all obvious when making a booking (for example my credit card statement only mentions booking.com) could be a problem for them, but in principle LSA is entirely accurate.
    Apologies, LSA.


    No problem, but thank you for the apology. It's a mistake that's often made. People presume they're an OTA when they're just a platform, an electronic go between.

    Knowing what capacity a company acts in is really one reason why booking terms and conditions need to be read before accepting them, no matter what we book and who with or through.
  • Perhaps I should add that if I had a problem I would still take Booking.com to court despite being aware of those T & Cs.
    All these type of companies try to minimise their liabilities but I do not see courts as being particularly sympathetic to this type of restriction.
  • Perhaps I should add that if I had a problem I would still take Booking.com to court despite being aware of those T & Cs.
    All these type of companies try to minimise their liabilities but I do not see courts as being particularly sympathetic to this type of restriction.

    What type of restriction?
  • What type of restriction?
    Claiming that their activities do not involve any responsibility.
  • Pollycat wrote: »
    You don't say if your booking was non-refundable or not...

    It was a non refundable room,but they spoke to hotel and I got refund.
    • 2010 wins-lottery £154.10,cadburys cream egg cup,2 cuddly koalas,Inju5ice cd,Danpak retro mp3 alarm,taste of London tickets,trip to LA for Valentines day premiere.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.