28 Days after appeal

ReadTheSmallPrint

As I said, it rejects thelink if only http is changed to hxxp.
hxxps://xxx.dropbox.com/s/j16onbkscu1ch1d/Parking%20space1.jpg?dl=0

ReadTheSmallPrint

Sorry Redex, I must have corrupted it with all the playing around. Redone the like here and tested ok - http and www changed to x's. Thank you for bearing with me

hxxps://xxx.dropbox.com/s/j16onbkscu1ch1d/Parking%20space1.jpg?dl=0

Le_Kirk

Your link made live: -
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j16onbkscu1ch1d/Parking%20space1.jpg?dl=0

ReadTheSmallPrint

Thank you Le_Kirk.

So with the pictures from the link above in y anyone's view is it worth toughing it out and tell them I'm happy to contest in court? The basis of my challenge is that although the vehicle was outside the marked bay the actual markings are ambiguous as a previous marking cut halfway through the bay and is 'hatched'. Therefore the driver could not comply with the 'rule' as if the vehicle had been fully in the bay it would have been on the hatched area and parking on such is also prohibited.This is also an end bay so the overhang did not infringe on an adjacent bay if that makes any difference - EG It's not reducing the capacity of the car park which is what the marked bays are intended to do in the implied contract. I think.

Le_Kirk

Seen similar defences on here where new markings had been laid over the of of old and therefore were ambiguous.

ReadTheSmallPrint

Successful defences?

Coupon-mad

Of course.

We have a consistent 99% success rate over more than 2 years, with hundreds of cases.

The 1% who lose are usually ill prepared, or just get a bad apple Judge.

Fruitcake

Is there any reason why you want the world to know the identity of the driver?

If this was not your intent then you should amend posts 7 and 25. You are advised throughout this site to only ever refer to The Driver and The Keeper, who are two different people.

The words, "I, me, myself" are prohibited on this forum except when referring to The Keeper or dealing with an "own space" case.

ReadTheSmallPrint

Thanks Coupon_Mad.
So, I lodged the online appeal which although acknowledged was not responded to. They then wrote saying they hadn't had payment and added another 30 quid to it saying if I didn't pay they would take it to Court. I wrote back giving them 14 days to respond to my appeal (which expires shortly).
Should I await their next letter or call them to tell them I have justifiable reason to expect this to be withdrawn (as I explained in the appeal to them) and tell them I am looking forward to presenting my case in Court?

Le_Kirk

Do NOT call them!