We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PCN from UKCPM
Comments
-
Your WS does not repeat the legal arguments you made in your defnece.
It lays out facts
You also introduce your evidence using the format INITIALS/001 (etc) - a photo showing....2 -
nosferatu1001 said:Your WS does not repeat the legal arguments you made in your defnece.
It lays out facts
You also introduce your evidence using the format INITIALS/001 (etc) - a photo showing....0 -
This is where I'm failing I think. I don't have ANY evidence? - I'm basing all this on the fact it's a scam and trying to get it thrown out due to Abuse of process.
You may need a bit more than that, what about contract, timeliness of documentation, compliance with POFA, , signage, LA consents? Did you complain to your MP?You never know how far you can go until you go too far.1 -
D_P_Dance said:Mathays said: This is where I'm failing I think. I don't have ANY evidence? - I'm basing all this on the fact it's a scam and trying to get it thrown out due to Abuse of process.
You may need a bit more than that, what about contract, timeliness, signage,, LA consents?2 -
I have a permit, it's where I live
Are you now saying, after nearly 50 posts, that this was a residential car park? If so read thishttp://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/11/residential-parking.htmlantsot
What does your lease/AST say about parking? Does it mention the need to display a permit? then it may take primacy over the self serving TnC of the scammer, and interfere with your lawful right to “quiet enjoyment” of your property, possible an offence under The Landlord and Tenants Acts.
You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0 -
Le_Kirk said:D_P_Dance said:Mathays said: This is where I'm failing I think. I don't have ANY evidence? - I'm basing all this on the fact it's a scam and trying to get it thrown out due to Abuse of process.
You may need a bit more than that, what about contract, timeliness, signage,, LA consents?
This is, of course, my own fault for not looking on here much earlier on in the process. Everything they sent through would suggest, as per one of my earlier posts, that they have me bang to rights. They even took a picture of my car clearly parked under a large sign giving all the penalty details. I genuinely wasn't paying enough attention to it. In my defence I said the area is poorly lit and I didn't notice any signage. I've just looked back at their evidence and, unless they have a lighting rig set up, most people would say the lighting is adequate and reasonable.
The issue I see is that the burden of proof is balance of probabilities. Based on that I'm pretty screwed I reckon0 -
D_P_Dance said:I have a permit, it's where I live
Are you now saying, after nearly 50 posts, that this was a residential car park? If so read thishttp://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/11/residential-parking.htmlantsot
What does your lease/AST say about parking? Does it mention the need to display a permit? then it may take primacy over the self serving TnC of the scammer, and interfere with your lawful right to “quiet enjoyment” of your property, possible an offence under The Landlord and Tenants Acts.
0 -
Now I am totally confused, I think I will pass.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Matthays said:D_P_Dance said:I have a permit, it's where I live
Are you now saying, after nearly 50 posts, that this was a residential car park? If so read thishttp://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2016/11/residential-parking.htmlantsot
What does your lease/AST say about parking? Does it mention the need to display a permit? then it may take primacy over the self serving TnC of the scammer, and interfere with your lawful right to “quiet enjoyment” of your property, possible an offence under The Landlord and Tenants Acts.
D_P_Dance said:
I asked the OP what his reasons were and gave some examples, you seem to have picked up on one of those and treated it as if it were fact!Now I am totally confused, I think I will pass.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards