We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
The Forum is currently experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
Immediately dangerous boiler (recently purchased flat)

LondonS30
Posts: 42 Forumite

Hi all,
I just moved into a property which I bought. The sellers were a family with a small child and the wife was also pregnant.
When I completed, the heating was working ok (they had left the heating on).
Then shortly after there was no heating or hot water. I topped up the boiler pressure and got an engineer to see. He deemed it immediately dangerous, no service history and it had not been maintained in a while. Inside the boiler, there was a cut wire which was "live" (I have photos), and also a lot of debris and algae. Also there were very high CO readings from the boiler and the flue. Which is obviously really dangerous.
The sellers did not provide a gas safety certificate or any evidence that the boiler had been maintained. The engineer said it was a legal requirement but googling it seems this is only a legal requirement when renting rather than selling.
I am really upset and angry, not about the money as I knew that I might have to replace the boiler at some point (as it is old) but more the idea that I have essentially walked into an unsafe property. I would've been happier at least being given information that the boiler was unsafe (rather than zero information) and essentially being at risk.
Whilst I didn't ask for this information specifically (amongst all the other house buying stresses), I semi assumed that a family with a young child would not take the risk of essentially living in a property with a dangerous boiler?! Or being so irresponsible as to either not get it serviced OR they knew about it and just ignored it... Next time I obviously will not assume
Has anyone been in this situation before? And in this scenario given the health and safety requirements, can anyone claim any sort of compensation for this happening ?!
Thanks
I just moved into a property which I bought. The sellers were a family with a small child and the wife was also pregnant.
When I completed, the heating was working ok (they had left the heating on).
Then shortly after there was no heating or hot water. I topped up the boiler pressure and got an engineer to see. He deemed it immediately dangerous, no service history and it had not been maintained in a while. Inside the boiler, there was a cut wire which was "live" (I have photos), and also a lot of debris and algae. Also there were very high CO readings from the boiler and the flue. Which is obviously really dangerous.
The sellers did not provide a gas safety certificate or any evidence that the boiler had been maintained. The engineer said it was a legal requirement but googling it seems this is only a legal requirement when renting rather than selling.
I am really upset and angry, not about the money as I knew that I might have to replace the boiler at some point (as it is old) but more the idea that I have essentially walked into an unsafe property. I would've been happier at least being given information that the boiler was unsafe (rather than zero information) and essentially being at risk.
Whilst I didn't ask for this information specifically (amongst all the other house buying stresses), I semi assumed that a family with a young child would not take the risk of essentially living in a property with a dangerous boiler?! Or being so irresponsible as to either not get it serviced OR they knew about it and just ignored it... Next time I obviously will not assume
Has anyone been in this situation before? And in this scenario given the health and safety requirements, can anyone claim any sort of compensation for this happening ?!
Thanks
0
Comments
-
No you have no claim , move on and forget it about0
-
There is no requirement for servicing or certificates in a private residence. It was your responsibility to confirm the state of the boiler.
Compo, no, not unless you instructed a competent person to inspect the boiler and they failed to identify the defects.0 -
Has anyone been in this situation before? And in this scenario given the health and safety requirements, can anyone claim any sort of compensation for this happening ?!
In the absence of any documentation. A fact that you were fully aware of prior to completing the purchase. Why didn't you pay to have the boiler inspected?0 -
When I completed, the heating was working ok
And you didn't have any checks or tests done before exchange?I knew that I might have to replace the boiler at some point (as it is old)but more the idea that I have essentially walked into an unsafe property. I would've been happier at least being given information that the boiler was unsafe (rather than zero information) and essentially being at risk.
Whilst I didn't ask for this information specifically (amongst all the other house buying stresses), I semi assumed that a family with a young child would not take the risk of essentially living in a property with a dangerous boiler?!And in this scenario given the health and safety requirements, can anyone claim any sort of compensation for this happening ?!
Replace your knackered boiler and get on with your life. It's not like you didn't know that you were going to have to do exactly that sooner or later... It just happens to be a bit sooner.
Next time, don't "semi-assume".0 -
has the boiler now been condemned and disconnected?0
-
Which country?
Assuming Eng/Wales then
* there is no requirement for a gas certificate
* there is no requirement for a service history unless you demanded one and the seller agred to get a service don
* you cannot expect the seller to be a gas engineer - they cannot be assumed to know of the CO leak, or exposed wire etc
* did you pay a GasSafe engineer to inspect and report on the boiler?
* did the seller give any specific undertakings regarding the safety and/or reliabiliy of the boiler? In writing? What exactly did they say (please quote)0 -
the answer you are looking for is the following: "I, and no one else, accept full responsibility for my own failure to check what I was buying."0
-
Lets be glad that child is no longer living in a house with an unsafe boiler. If you gas person is telling you they should have had a gas safety certificate you may want to get another engineer out to check the boiler as he sounds cluelessAn answer isn't spam just because you don't like it......0
-
After a full service and repair it could be fine for 3 more years. Never trust what British gas say.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 242.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards