Waitrose, BW Legal, Britannia Parking, John Lewis Legal team

twhitehousescat

beamerguy wrote: »

Does anyone else know if there is a time limit after which time the PPC cannot chase the payment

6 years in England and wales, 5 years in Scotland

NO NO NO

they can chase as long as they want , they can continue to write to you for the next 30 yrs

HOWEVER , they can only start county court proceedings , 6 years in England and wales, 5 years in Scotland


should they continue in letters after those dates THREATENING court action , then YOU can take action

BS_Newbie

beamerguy wrote: »

Does anyone else know if there is a time limit after which time the PPC cannot chase the payment

6 years in England and wales, 5 years in Scotland

thank you beamer guy - I did have the 6 year figure in my head and so it would seem that the doctrine of laches may not apply as its only 2019 so they are well within the 6 years .

beamerguy

twhitehousescat wrote: »

NO NO NO

they can chase as long as they want , they can continue to write to you for the next 30 yrs

HOWEVER , they can only start county court proceedings , 6 years in England and wales, 5 years in Scotland


should they continue in letters after those dates THREATENING court action , then YOU can take action

Nobody said about chasing, that could go on forever.

As you say, court proceedings are limited

https://moneyaware.co.uk/2013/10/statute-barred-debt/

Umkomaas

beamerguy wrote: »

Does anyone else know if there is a time limit after which time the PPC cannot chase the payment

6 years in England and wales, 5 years in Scotland

beamerguy wrote: »

Nobody said about chasing,

Really? It’s absolutely the question raised by the OP, then re-quoted by you.

beamerguy

Umkomaas wrote: »

Really? It’s absolutely the question raised by the OP, then re-quoted by you.

Oh dear, never mind. You are in SA as you said .... it's 30 years down there

Umkomaas

beamerguy wrote: »

Oh dear, never mind. You are in SA as you said .... it's 30 [STRIKE]years[/STRIKE] degrees down there

FTFY BG! :cool:

beamerguy

Umkomaas wrote: »

FTFY BG! :cool:

haha, it's a google thing.

BS_Newbie

Thanks guys - so I think we wont complicate things with the Laches unless its deemed necessary.

I would be very grateful if anyone can offer thoughts on my question in post 161 https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5985916/waitrose-bw-legal-britannia-parking-john-lewis-legal-team&page=9#161 above about whether or not we keep in the question in the SAR asking BP to give a list of all Parking Charge Notices BP consider are outstanding against them or not,

RK not panicking as much today as last night but is very concerned about this .

Bi g thanks in advance again

rachity

BS_Newbie wrote: »

thank you beamer guy - I did have the 6 year figure in my head and so it would seem that the doctrine of laches may not apply as its only 2019 so they are well within the 6 years .

Laches is very applicable.


The doctrine (one of the maxims of equity) runs alongside the stricter common law remedies, & is concerned more with fairness (ie, is it just, all things considered?)

BS_Newbie

So the RK was extremely uncomfortable about leaving in the SAR the bit about asking BP for a list of any other PCN's they consider are a are outstanding against them so they sent it off without that question in there. the emails were also sent to Waitrose & cc'd to JL, BPA & BW Legal.

Interesting automatic response and a prize will be awarded for anyone who can spot the appalling mistake in their grammar!!!!

I am sure that everyone who has been here for a while is more than familiar with this response so i haven't copied all of it but its the first one i've ever seen and as such I am surprised that they state that picture packs and copies of the signage will be provided as evidence at court.

Is there any response the RK can go back to BP with at this time to challenge them on this. for the signs its irrelevant anyway as the RK has all the pictures of the signs from 2016 and as they are now

BP auto response
Dear Sir/Madam,
We have received your Subject Access Request, under ICO guidelines we have one calendar month to respond.
Please be aware we will send a copy of all personal data we hold only. If you have made a request for any additional information which does not qualify as personal data, please see below.
:YOU'RE :rotfl:REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• Landowner agreement - You are not entitled to business sensitive information, it will only be supplied at court, as evidence and not before.
• Contract with the driver - The contract is on the signage in the car park. A copy of the signage will be provided as evidence at court.
• Machine reports - You are not entitled to transactions which do not relate to you, you will be provided with your transaction only. We are under no obligation to provide you with anything further.
• Picture packs - A copy of the signage will be provided as evidence at court.