We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PPI rejected
Options

Lisa0101
Posts: 7 Forumite
Hi wonder if anyone can help. I recently put a claim in with egg (Canada square operations) which was one of many accounts I had many years ago. It came back rejected on 2 questions. One was did I get sick pay/redundancy etc... at the time I couldn't remember exactly how long but ticked the 6 month one. I know though that I used to get full sick pay and would have got a good redundancy package if I was to be made redundant. Also the question did I have any other means of paying if I was out if work. I didn't have any other insurances but my partner at the time was in a high earning job which would have covered all the bills that needed paying without a doubt so put this as my reason and egg have rejected my claim. Does this sound fair enough to be rejected? If I had put that I got full sick pay for 12 months plus (which I probably would of done i just couldn't remember at the time) would this have made a difference? What are you meant to put for a successful claim if you can't remember many of the details?
Many thanks
Many thanks
0
Comments
-
You're meant to put the truth, for both claims and complaints.
If you're guessing at the information and it's wrong, that would be a good reason for a declined complaint.
Your complaint reasons don't sound very strong, even if they are real.0 -
If you had claimed 12 months or more full sick pay then you would’ve been asked to provide proof as that level of sick pay is exceptionally rare. Your parents income was/is irrelevant.
If you can’t remember then you say as much - or you lie, then you are making fraudulent statements to try and obtain funds by deception... good luck with that one.0 -
Does this sound fair enough to be rejected?
You have given us the rejection reasons. What were they?
Redundancy package is not really much of a concern. Most PPI pays out in addition to redundancy. And if the employer fails, the package is often disregarded and you end up on statutory.
Sick pay can be an issue. If the PPI pays out in addition to sick pay then it's not bad. If it does not pay out in addition and you have 6-12 months then you would usually get an upheld decision.
Reliance on a spouse carries more weight than relying on a partner. Unless history with that partner is long term.If I had put that I got full sick pay for 12 months plus (which I probably would of done i just couldn't remember at the time) would this have made a difference?
Most firms have a database of employer benefits. They usually ask you so they can check against their database for differences. So, telling lies or giving random guesses does not help if they can see otherwise. They would normally ask you for proof of sick pay when it differs to a level that may make a difference.What are you meant to put for a successful claim if you can't remember many of the details?
"i dont remember" or "I am not sure." or words like that.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
If I had put that I got full sick pay for 12 months plus (which I probably would of done i just couldn't remember at the time) would this have made a difference?
Can you evidence this (very generous) sick pay scheme? You don't really expect the Bank to simply accept your word for it, especially as it contradicts your earlier statement.
Other means of paying would not be a partner or family member with a good wage. It would be significant savings, which again you'd have to evidence, that might have swung it for you.What are you meant to put for a successful claim if you can't remember many of the details?
If you disagree with the rejection, you have six months to refer the complaint to the Ombudsman.0 -
Would it be something I can contact my old employer about and ask them so I have the correct details or is this not a done thing? December 2004 I left there so along time ago0
-
you can of course ask, however they would have to also supply you with proof that you would’ve been entitled to that level of sick pay st the time of the sale.
I would put money on it being nowhere near 12 months or more full sick pay - as already stated this is VERY generous and almost unheard of - even public sector workers (generally consider to have some of the best benefits) do not receive that level of pay.0 -
You really just can't just make things up and guess at stuff to suit your complaint...how do you think that will be viewed?0
-
So if nobody gets a good sick pay package then everyone is going to get their claim rejected on that question then?0
-
Would it be something I can contact my old employer about and ask them so I have the correct details or is this not a done thing? December 2004 I left there so along time ago
You could contact your old employer and ask them to provide proof of your sick pay and then send this with your complaint referral to the Ombudsman, but I suspect you'll find you didn't actually have 12 months sick pay as that is extremely rare.
However, as explained earlier, your complaint will not have hinged simply on you saying you only had six months sick pay. Read the rejection letter and digest all the reasons they gave for not upholding your complaint.So if nobody gets a good sick pay package then everyone is going to get their claim rejected on that question then?0 -
So if nobody gets a good sick pay package then everyone is going to get their claim rejected on that question then?
People do get a good sick pay package. Most people overestimate their sick pay package.
Where the PPI doesnt pay out in addition, then its a good complaint reason. Where the PPI does pay out in addition, then its weak or even pointless complaint reason.
You still havent given us the reasons why it was rejected.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards