RobinHood- Doncaster Airport, approach road PCN from VCS

Redx

If you are going to submit half of the London library then print it yourself and hand deliver the bundle , plus post to the claimant too

Excerpts are fine , providing the court can look up the initial time , so excerpts from POFA , the CRA , Beavis etc , no need for the whole thing, keep the excerpts as Exhibits and number them with your initials plus a number , such as JPS01 , JPS02 etc and a brief reference to them in the WS , also add an exhibit for the Abuse of process , the CRA , plus your costs schedule too

If it is greater than 50 pages , it's overcooked , this isn't the Kray Twins trial , just a small claims court dispute , the keyword is Small

nosferatu1001

You dont submit the POFA, as its available to them to look up on their terminal > Just the excerpt relevant to you. 

Ja99iE

Cheers guys.

Got it to 47 pages now. Sending it in.

BenR25

Any update on how this went

Ja99iE

BenR25 said:

Any update on how this went

It's been adjourned twice due to VCS arriving unprepared in court once, then a second time on a conference call hearing with different representation who again was unprepared. There's a 3rd and hopefully final hearing scheduled for early December. 

Coupon-mad

OMG I hope you asked for your costs each time to be reserved or ordered to be paid by VCS! 

Some courts are too indulgent of PPC scammers.

Ja99iE

I finally had my hearing this morning. I'm pleased to say that I won!

The audio wasn't great on the call during the judge's summation, but the emergency stop due to choking appeared to be the persuasive argument that swung it in my favour. She deemed the contact to be unfair as it did not allow for stopping in an emergency, say for an unexpected sudden health issue.

The call ended promptly after the judgement, and the judge didn't mention anything about costs. VCS tried to appeal but she shot them down. I'm so pleased it's over that I am not really bothered about the costs, so that's fine.

Redx

Well done , VCS lose yet again

Another one bites the dust !!

Umkomaas

Very well done in beating the 'No stopping where stopping is not allowed' scam. 

She deemed the contact to be unfair as it did not allow for stopping in an emergency, say for an unexpected sudden health issue.

There never was any contract. The three main component parts of a contract are:

• an offer.
• an acceptance.
• a consideration (usually money).

Not one of those in evidence in VCS airport stopping signage. Their charge was a disguised penalty - no private organisation can issue one of those. The Judge got it right, but not for the right reason in my view!

Coupon-mad

So the Airport byelaws include an exemption for stopping in an emergency, but VCS decide to pretend that exemption doesn't exist. 

It's been adjourned twice due to VCS arriving unprepared in court once, then a second time on a conference call hearing with different representation who again was unprepared. There's a 3rd and hopefully final hearing scheduled for early December. 

They deserve the cost these three hearings have put them to, but it's a shame you didn't ask for your costs, given the above waste of your time, 3 times.

However, a win is a win, and great to see (for the 2nd time today) ANOTHER VCS ONE BITES THE DUST!