IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Miss R versus VCS Ltd

Options
1678911

Comments

  • Just as a matter of interest, was this claim one of the VCS 2015 claims?

    No, this was a failure to display a valid permit on a residential site in September 2018. It has taken over a year to finally get justice.
    Even Richard Turpin had the decency to wear a mask!
  • beamerguy wrote: »
    HA, we can only hope that SRS invested the £3 you send him wisely, maybe a new scam :rotfl::rotfl:

    I have not sent SRS a penny, so he's lost out on that too:rotfl:
    Even Richard Turpin had the decency to wear a mask!
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 43,384 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    JesterShoe wrote: »
    First of all, I would like to give a very big thank you to the great people on this forum who have helped me with this case. You all deserve a very big pat on the back.

    Myself and my Lay rep were in court today and both claims have been struck out.

    The main argument that the Judge summarized on was that there was no consideration in the contract. The point is that the parties must exchange something of value. Consideration is needed so that both parties incur some sort of burden or obligation in the agreement. VCS could not offer me anything of value as I was already parked in my own demised parking bay, so no contract could exist.

    I also had £250 cost awarded in my favor but the claim for unreasonable behavior was not entertained.

    Using this 'consideration' argument could blow a big hole in future residential parking charge cases.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • Snakes_Belly
    Snakes_Belly Posts: 3,704 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    Using this 'consideration' argument could blow a big hole in future residential parking charge cases.

    Good point.

    Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Umkomaas wrote: »
    Using this 'consideration' argument could blow a big hole in future residential parking charge cases.
    I agree, it seems a big issue considering that VCS were offering nothing to the defendant in the parking contract they thought had been accepted when the defendant parked in their own bay
  • I would also like to point out that I was not the leaseholder of the parking bay, but a short term tenant, the actual leaseholder was my landlady. You need to prove you have your landlords permission to park and in doing so have the same rights as if you were the leaseholder.

    This should also give encouragement to any rental tenants who have been wrongly PCN'ed for parking in there own rented bay.
    Even Richard Turpin had the decency to wear a mask!
  • Snakes_Belly
    Snakes_Belly Posts: 3,704 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Some good points coming out of this case.

    Nolite te bast--des carborundorum.
  • JesterShoe
    JesterShoe Posts: 67 Forumite
    edited 18 August 2019 at 2:05PM
    I will publish the court transcripts when I get them.

    There was an mix-up at the start of the hearing as VCS were under the impression that this case was for just one of the PCN's. I had written to the court twice to get a consolidation, and also once to VCS to tell them that I was doing it, and tell them that they should have already done it at the start. (:TThanks Coupon-mad:T)

    The agent for VCS tried to get an adjournment as he said he had no witness statement for the second case, I pointed out that it was the same PCN issued at two different times over one night.(I should have also mentioned double recovery at this point but missed the chance) I also pointed out, about the letters to the court and themselves and our defense was identical for both claims.

    The Judge could see that, as the defendant we had tried to do our upmost to clear the whole matter up in one sitting and told the agent that he was proceeding, as we were all sitting in front of him. If VCS didn't like it they could appeal, and as it was their claim they should have been on the ball.
    Even Richard Turpin had the decency to wear a mask!
  • The_Deep
    The_Deep Posts: 16,830 Forumite
    Another unreasonable claim denied unreasonable behaviour costs. Where is the justice in that?

    What is needed is for judges to award punitive costs when these fake claims go south.
    You never know how far you can go until you go too far.
  • From what I could work out from the Judge's denial of my unreasonable costs claim, that it only pertains to the court proceedings and not the claimants behavior overall. I tried vexatious litigant, misuse of private information, breach of contract, fraud by abuse of position, and trespass.

    I think I missed another trick with not issuing a counter claim at the start, but as you are so stressed out and nervous about the whole procedure you just want the case sorted. It's only after that you realise how much time and effort you have put in that the compensation factor kicks in.
    Even Richard Turpin had the decency to wear a mask!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.