IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.

Britannia/BW Legal Claim Form

Options
12346

Comments

  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,410 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Options
    They can legitimately claim court filing and hearing fees (£25 each) and £50 legal fees, if incurred.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • jackpot_spaniel
    Options
    They can legitimately claim court filing and hearing fees (£25 each) and £50 legal fees, if incurred.

    But CPR 27.14 says:
    (2) The court may not order a party to pay a sum to another party in respect of that other party’s costs, fees and expenses, including those relating to an appeal, except –
    ...
    (b) in proceedings which included a claim for an injunction or an order for specific performance a sum not exceeding the amount specified in Practice Direction 27 for legal advice and assistance relating to that claim;

    And that's the only mention of legal fees... I've also clarified on the internet and everywhere says legal fees cannot be claimed on the small claims track...
  • Redx
    Redx Posts: 38,084 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Options
    Bargepole wrote the fees allowed on here some time ago

    What Umkomaas wrote above is a short summary and he is correct , which is why we know that any sum claimed above £200 has hidden unwarranted charges in it

    Parking Eye usually charge around £175 in their claims because they do their own legal work , so that is the benchmark

    The claimant can claim the original charge , usually £100 , plus the 2 filing fees , plus interest if allowed , they must prove they incurred legal fees in their costs schedule and the maximum is £50 , as mentioned above

    I suggest you read what bargepole wrote some time ago , plus Umkomaas has mentioned the allowed charges numerous times too

    What they cannot charge for is say £200 to cover their legal reps costs , even though those people ask for it at hearings
  • jackpot_spaniel
    Options
    Thanks for clarifying, however, I'm very confused as to why this is not clearly stated within the CPR, or anywhere else 'official' that I can find...
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,410 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Options
    Thanks for clarifying, however, I'm very confused as to why this is not clearly stated within the CPR, or anywhere else 'official' that I can find...

    https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/litigant-in-person-costs-and-expenses.aspx
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • Coupon-mad
    Coupon-mad Posts: 132,159 Forumite
    Name Dropper First Post Photogenic First Anniversary
    Options
    I'm not legally qualified but isn't it here, where table shows £50 applies:

    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part45-fixed-costs
    PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
    CLICK at the top of this/any page where it says:
    Forum Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD
  • Umkomaas
    Umkomaas Posts: 41,410 Forumite
    First Anniversary Name Dropper First Post Photogenic
    Options
    Coupon-mad wrote: »
    I'm not legally qualified but isn't it here, where table shows £50 applies:

    https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part45-fixed-costs

    Yep, which is from where the advice on the MCOL website I've linked is lifted.
    Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .

    I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.

    Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.

    Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street
  • beamerguy
    beamerguy Posts: 17,587 Forumite
    First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper First Post
    Options
    Thanks for clarifying, however, I'm very confused as to why this is not clearly stated within the CPR, or anywhere else 'official' that I can find...

    jackpot, is this in Reading tomorrow, if so PM me, thanks
  • jackpot_spaniel
    Options
    It's a WIN! But not how I expected at all...

    We basically debated the following point of my Witness Statement for two hours:
    Section 9 of Schedule 4 of the POFA details the explicit requirements of a Notice to Keeper, including the timeline that must be given. Section 9(2)(f) requires the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) to: “warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given…” However, the Claimant’s PCN notes that: “You are warned that if, after 28 days, the Parking Charge has not been paid in full…” Therefore, the Claimant’s PCN is not compliant with Section 9(2)(f) of the POFA, and misleads the consumer about the statutory timeline. Indeed, the Claimant notes within their PCN that their right to pursue the Keeper is “subject to our complying with the applicable conditions under Schedule 4 of” the POFA.

    The judge approached it from many angles, but the overall decision was that the PCN was non-compliant with the specifics of the POFA, which clearly states "The notice must..."

    Permission to appeal was denied by the judge, but I'll have to wait 28 days to see if Britannia do want to appeal it.

    I was awarded my ordinary costs, but not the 'unreasonable' costs.

    Happy weekend all!
  • Le_Kirk
    Le_Kirk Posts: 22,336 Forumite
    First Anniversary First Post Photogenic Name Dropper
    Options
    Two hours to convince a judge of something that is LAW. Blimey, anyway well done on the win.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 343.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 449.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 235.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 608.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 173.2K Life & Family
  • 248.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards