We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Arson attack claim
Comments
-
What? You are bang out of order to claim that I made any such suggestion at all! I did not! My only reply to the OP was post #2 ... my other replies were to the resident forum troublemaker. NONE of those posts suggest in ANY WAY AT ALL what you have inferred.DoaM and CardinalWolsey are bang out of order in suggesting you committed arson and insurance fraud yourself. Don't let the minority put you off the majority.0 -
It's hard to read this any other way...CardinalWolsey wrote: »Where did I suggest that?
...but I'm sure we'd all be glad to hear any clarification.CardinalWolsey wrote: »1. Individual on a relatively young PCP deal loses job.
2. Said individual's PCP'ed car is set fire to, for a total loss
3. Individual does not want to re-finance.
Occam's Razor
Again, hard to read this any other way...What? You are bang out of order to claim that I made any such suggestion at all! I did not!You can get insurance to cover yourself committing arson? Who knew!0 -
Well done ... :T
Nice way to take a post completely out of context. It was quite a clearly tongue-in-cheek response to the post I quoted. Hardly my fault you're unable to see this.0 -
You say its hard to read it any other way - you've read three salient points and jumped to a conclusion. Not made up points, but points pulled from the OP's posts. If you've added 1+1+1 and come up with 5, will you be the only one? So the OP needs to be careful about the language they couch this in. Because if people on a public forum are reading more in to this, what will professional loss adjusters make of it?It's hard to read this any other way...
...but I'm sure we'd all be glad to hear any clarification.0 -
Well, no, I didn't take that from the OP's posts at all.
I did, however, very clearly take it from your enumeration of them plus the pointer to Occam's Razor - the simplest explanation is most likely to be true.0 -
Well done ... :T
Nice way to take a post completely out of context. It was quite a clearly tongue-in-cheek response to the post I quoted. Hardly my fault you're unable to see this.
It wasn't clear at all. Nor was Cardinal Wolsey's post.
I believe people should say what they mean and mean what they say.
What does a handshake and a gentleman's verbal agreement mean to you?0 -
You can take help from public adjusters.0
-
The PPR Police are quick off the mark today.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178K Life & Family
- 260.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards