Brexit the economy and house prices part 7: Brexit Harder

Herzlos

adindas wrote: »

Now you convince the British people that the romanian / bulgarian gypsies who are camping around the Hide park, any London Landmark in summer, some of them are using the sites as public toilet are good for the UK. Could you legally remove these people from the UK ??

You can legally remove those ones. They make up a tiny percentage of EU immigrants, who statistically put in more than they take out.

You tell British people those EU people who can not compete in their own countries but come to the UK is good for the UK. Could you legally prevent them to come to the UK ??

Those aren't the ones coming here. We're draining eastern europe of it's best people and causing problems there.

People who do not work, never contribute to NI, none of their parents, grandparents ever contribute to benefit system but later qualify to get state support (benefit) are good for the UK ?? Could you legally remove them ??

Yup, you can legally remove any migrant who isn't self sufficient in 3 months.

Also prioritising the EU people is even hinder the Labour market for the best people for the country.

But it doesn't hinder the labour market.

What about the best people from other countries such as Japan, Korea, China India, Russia, US, Australia, Canada, South Africa, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and many other countries.

The quotas from non EU countries are arbitrary and largely counter productive. We should be bringing more of them in too.

adindas

As usual Herloz response. Always hiding something.
Based on the EU Article 28 of Citizens’ Directive 2004/38 they can only be deported from another member state for reasons of public policy or public security. Good luck then if you could apply that to the Bulgarian / Romanian Gypsies.

This has happened many times in the Past, the government has organised a special coach to send them back home. They will come back again the following week without UK government could do anything. So the intention to remove them is actually a free trip for them on the cost of UK taxpayers.

I never say that UK should not accept the best EU citizen what I was saying is that prioritising the EU people if you are to search the best people for the country, is not good if UK is to attract the best people. It is against the basic principle of Liberal economy. There is no wonder the critics say EU cartel and protected economy.

What about the best people from other countries such as Japan, Korea, China India, Russia, US, Australia, Canada, South Africa, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and many other countries.

Just look at in the US how many CEOs, richest people on earth, scientists actresses come from other countries other than EU.

I am waiting for you and other arch remoaners on this thread after January 31, 2020 to acknowledge that you and remoaners are losers. You preseated a lot of useless unfounded argument in the past not many buy it. People are not stupid, Not many people have bought the remoaners argument the benefit of staying in the EU.Just see the result of the recent GE.

Herzlos wrote: »

You can legally remove those ones. They make up a tiny percentage of EU immigrants, who statistically put in more than they take out.


Those aren't the ones coming here. We're draining eastern europe of it's best people and causing problems there.




Yup, you can legally remove any migrant who isn't self sufficient in 3 months.



But it doesn't hinder the labour market.


The quotas from non EU countries are arbitrary and largely counter productive. We should be bringing more of them in too.

Just look at in the US how many CEOs, richest people on earth, scientists actresses come from other countries other than EU.

You will get a better result if you maintain control to screen who you want who you do not want.

Herzlos

We're all losers, buddy.

Moe_The_Bartender

Herzlos wrote: »

We're draining eastern europe of it's best people and causing problems there.

Kerching! The sound of a penny finally dropping. What took you so long?

BikingBud

gfplux wrote: »

QUOTE
Property experts are unanimous in their assertions that any buyer of 2-8a Rutland Gate will most likely be from the former Soviet Union or the Middle East.
END QUOTE

https://www.swlondoner.co.uk/300million-knightsbridge-mansion-uk-s-most-expensive-ever/

BREXIT

Hope they can put up with ghosts!

Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich, celebrity chef Nigella Lawson, actress Joan Collins, super-model Elle Macpherson and Margaret Thatcher are just some of the people who call Knightsbridge home.

Maybe the Iron Lady keeps the residents in check by coming out spooking occasionally.

Herzlos

Moe_The_Bartender wrote: »

Kerching! The sound of a penny finally dropping. What took you so long?

That's never been denied. I just dont believe that anyone cares enough about the plight of Eastern European economies to destroy the British economy in order to help them.

Sailtheworld

Herzlos wrote: »

That's never being denied. I just dont believe that anyone cares enough about the plight of Eastern European economies to destroy the British economy in order to help them.

The brexiteers around here are oh so altruistic don't you know? They're so worried about declining populations in Eastern Europe and the UK poaching the best & brightest talent they'd love it if they would all just go home.

Of course then we'd have a declining population and would be losing the brightest and best but these guys just want the best for Eastern European countries. I love them - they're a credit to the UK.

Sailtheworld

Thrugelmir wrote: »

Well said.

Should point out that you are replying to an ex-pat that never returns home ...........

The high level of debate continues I see. That's a real killer point well made there. Any responses made to someone who doesn't visit the UK can be safely discounted. Did you learn this at the Oxford Debating Society?

Of course we can ignore your points of view because I believe you VOLUNTARILY visit foreign countries. I prefer to listen to people who live in places like Boston and don't venture further than Skeggy for their holidays to get a feel for the beating heart of the nation.

Moe_The_Bartender

Herzlos wrote: »

That's never being denied. I just dont believe that anyone cares enough about the plight of Eastern European economies to destroy the British economy in order to help them.

Those like you who have constantly extolled the benefits of free movement have always denied the obvious. You are changing your tune a bit late in the day.

Your second sentence makes no sense.

Herzlos

Moe_The_Bartender wrote: »

Those like you who have constantly extolled the benefits of free movement have always denied the obvious. You are changing your tune a bit late in the day.

What obvious have I denied?

Your second sentence makes no sense.

I'll try again. One valid argument for Brexit is that the UK having free movement with the EU hurts Eastern Europe, I can agree with that (less so the nonsense about African farmers we used to get).
However, I don't believe that anyone who voted for Brexit did so to help the Easter European countries at our own expense.


Is that any clearer? English may not be my first language (que the outrage!)