Claim form pack arrived for parking fines on private land

simone82

Anyone else having issues with posting? Continuous errors saying cannot post please retry in 60 seconds, contact administrator etc

KeithP

You cannot post more than once within a minute.

It is to try and stop spammers.

Le_Kirk

simone82 wrote: »

Anyone else having issues with posting? Continuous errors saying cannot post please retry in 60 seconds, contact administrator etc

I get this all the time, it's because I type so fast!!




ETA And it has just happened to this reply!

simone82

Thanks @keithP, I wasnt trying to post within 60 seconds I was asking a question about my post yesterday. Upon googling this issue it seems this error is common, I a having to use my personal data on my mobile phone to post this now as apparently my IP address is blocked (my home wifi)

KeithP

Copying directly from MSWord etc to this forum is likely to lead to your IP address being banned. Copy via notepad to avoid this.

See here:

forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5706338

The good news is that the forum software is due to change next month, but that in itself will, I'm sure, bring a host of new problems.

simone82

Thanks Keithp now it makes sense as I drafted my WS on Word first! Thanks for letting me know

I don't suppose you have a moment to read my first draft? Would appreciate some feedback, ive spent a while trawling through many threads and have tried to use what I can from previous residential threads

Le_Kirk

a Service Access Request (SAR)

Should be: -

a [strike]Service[/strike] Subject Access Request (SAR)

Your first few paragraphs seem to be more of a defence than a witness statement (WS). A WS is "in support of my defence as already filed" and so there is no need to repeat it. A WS should be a narrative of what happened at the time and subsequently, written in your own words, which you have done. You should find some more ammunition for your abuse of process paragraphs by looking at threads by CEC16 and basher52 or by searching for the thread by beamerguy about Abuse of Process and the comments at post #14 of that thread by Coupon-mad

1505grandad

All paras should be numbered - perhaps they are missing when c @ p to forum.

simone82

Thank you, I will research more Abuse of Process threads and add more substance..

Le_Kirk wrote: »

Should be: -
Your first few paragraphs seem to be more of a defence than a witness statement (WS). A WS is "in support of my defence as already filed" and so there is no need to repeat it. A WS should be a narrative of what happened at the time and subsequently, written in your own words, which you have done. You should find some more ammunition for your abuse of process paragraphs by looking at threads by CEC16 and basher52 or by searching for the thread by beamerguy about Abuse of Process and the comments at post #14 of that thread by Coupon-mad

simone82

@Coupon-mad


In response to my SARS sent again, I have received the following response from Gladstone's:


" Thank you for your correspondence. Please note that the Witness Statement which will include our client's supporting evidence will be served on you according to the Court's directions."


So they have ignored my request for the missing PCN's that I require. Clearly by not providing me with those copies, and photos etc they are refusing my SARS request, what can I do about this?


Also I have noticed that since my original PCN's were issued, PCM have changed where they have placed their signage. When the PCN's were issued the signs were in different places (some can be seen on the pictures they have provided etc), however now their new signs are all conveniently placed directly on the lamp posts within the car park so there is no excuse that the signs could not be seen clearly!


Very sneaky of them, I'm not sure when they replaced these signs as this was way before I received the Court paperwork!!

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Write a quick letter to the Judge by name and ask that claim numbers xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx be consolidated.

Use the words by bargepole, EVEN IF you already did. Your Judge has not noticed:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/76103592#Comment_76103592

That poster went on to win!

Totally agree. Makes no sense.

Have they conflated some of the dates from the second claim, across to this one? Either way, cover it in your WS and say how you are confused, then lead into mentioning your Supplementary WS about parking firms NOT being able to lawfully recover additional costs above a £100 parking charge that already includes those same costs.