We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Help please - have i made a mistake?
Options
Comments
-
this is the bit that interested me:
"There is not a total ban on the use of ANPR in the context of enforcement in offstreet car parks; ANPR technology is only restricted as the sole means of enforcement."
The car park where the keeper's car was parked in this particular case did not have barriers and ANPR was indeed the sole means of enforcement. So my question is, as the parish council owned the car park, even though they used an enforcement company to enforce parking restrictions, is the fact that ANPR was used as the sole means of enforcement enough to make the PCN issued unlawful?0 -
Pretty sure parish councils are not covered. Theyre not an EA.0
-
what is EA?
Why would they not be covered? Cos they not a traffic authority? Cos they are in the definition. !!!!!! me this is confusing!!0 -
Enforcement Authority. Parish councils cant enforce decrim penalties under the TMA2004
Remember that POFA may define a Parish Council differently than the MHCLG does. Different legidlation does not have to use the exact meaning each time. THey use the definition internal to themselves.1 -
If Parish councils cant enforce then why are they buying land, turning them in to car parks and then generating revenue for the council in doing so?0
-
BW Legal has written to registered keeper offering to settle at £100. is that usual, or a clear sign that they know they will lose.
Along with the offer is a rebuttal to keeper's defence (full of grammatical errors) which includes points that were not even on the defence statement!0 -
Chances are it's a last ditch attempt before a discontinuation0
-
IMO you have them on the back foot. Now is the time to play hard ball. If it goes to xcourt conside claiming costs for unreasonable behaviour.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Redx said:Chances are it's a last ditch attempt before a discontinuation0
-
Standupforyourself said:If Parish councils cant enforce then why are they buying land, turning them in to car parks and then generating revenue for the council in doing so?
Theres a huge, gaping difference between the two and you cant conflate them.1
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards