We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking Eye Court Letter
Comments
-
Here is my reply again
I Mr will clearly state again your camera's have failed on 3 occasions on my vehicle that I have proof and evidence to show , you have already cancelled 2 of the 3 false allegations but because there is money involved in one case you won't cancel it , Again I will say you have falsely accused me of being parked on car parks when I have clearly not and have 100% evidence to back me up all the way
If this case is not dropped along with the other 2 cases I will sue Parking Eye for Data Misuse and Negligent processing of my VRN data with no obvious manual checks being made at all , in breach of the BPA code of practice and the ICO Surveillance camera code of practice
If not sorted out I will Sue parking Eye for £500 for this data protection breach , loss and distress to myself and family and report the case to the ICO for a reportable data processing failure on behalf of your company
This will be my last offer to you and give you the oppertunity to have this cleared by Thursday 28th June , otherwise I will start proceedings to Sue your company
Therefore the £97 plus the £100 court fee must be cleared at no cost to me whatsoever and the default judgement cleared
I will state again you have til Thursday 28th June to gave this case all cleared , if not I will pay the £197 cost under protest but will press forward and Sue Parking Eye0 -
You need them to consent to the set aside. The current judgment is for a total of £197. If you were simply to get them to agree a basic set aside you would need to pay £100 (which is a different £100 to the court costs already in the judgment against you).
So you should be asking them to cover that additional £100, which is the £100 Coupon-mad was referring to (the set aside by consent fee).Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
i wrote to barnet mp as well as harrow mp by the way, using 'write to your mp' service and have not received any response yet. i hope they look at and act upon the message.0
-
Shal4, did you mean to post that on this thread?0
-
yes... that i am not sure how much interest MPs are showing on irradicating this problem.
is it ok to post such comment on another person's thread?0 -
this https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/parkingcodeofpractice.html is the interest SOME mp,s are showing in this topic , as can be seen in the second debate in parliament on 02 feb 2018 where Sir Greg Knight set it out and MP,s from all sides slagged off the companies , trade bodies and debt collection agencies , with not one CHOPE amongst them
as for individual MP,s , that depends on themselves , you wont get every MP involved, but enough of them are fed up with the topic in their mailboxes to do something about it , hence that Private Members Bill0 -
this https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2017-19/parkingcodeofpractice.html is the interest SOME mp,s are showing in this topic , as can be seen in the second debate in parliament on 02 feb 2018 where Sir Greg Knight set it out and MP,s from all sides slagged off the companies , trade bodies and debt collection agencies , with not one CHOPE amongst them
as for individual MP,s , that depends on themselves , you wont get every MP involved, but enough of them are fed up with the topic in their mailboxes to do something about it , hence that Private Members Bill
Redx, sorry if this means i am hijacking this thread- i do not mean to. please do let me know if i can do anything more to remove this problem. i really want to end this injustice. because many motorists i also know, who know the charge is unfair but they pay to avoid court and appeal hassle etc.0 -
Deadline for payment was tomorrow and I've had no reply back from Parking Eye so to avoid a CCJ I've had to pay these Cowboys £197 of my hard earned money today , really annoyed over this
Who do I speak with now regarding this matter and who can help me and let me know the procedure to try and get my money back
Thanks0 -
seeing as you have paid it , the matter is closed and nothing you can say or do will get you any money back
its gone , over with , end of story0 -
seeing as you have paid it , the matter is closed and nothing you can say or do will get you any money back
its gone , over with , end of story
So what you saying I shouldn't of paid it , then I get a CCJ that will ruin my credit for the next 6 years ? , can you explain further why I shouldn't have paid it ?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
